Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction As much as I dislike building my own reputation up in formal discourse, as it is irresponsible and self-loving, and therefore counter-intuitively undermines the ability to exegete at any level, I must offer this compendium as a prelude and recommend that one either buys the book in paperback, in order to learn the "Christian Psychology," presented therein, or download the eBook version from here "The Nature of Mankinde," which is a form of psychology that trumps even Donald Trump in its boldness, however, is far more righteous and meek, and yet provides a fundamentally secure and powerful thesis of how the mind works, from the lowest levels of mental activity upwards. However, because this is such a daunting task, I had only finished a very strong amount of it, with a superficial syntax relation of the thesis of bi-cognominalism, and the activity of syntax in oneself, at the personal level, and then at the sociological level. This essay will describe the relationship between syntax and bi-cognominalism, both at the personal level, and at the sociological level. It is always a tacit Polanyian-esque integration, from a predicating bi-cognal formation of thought, into a syntactical formation system, which delivers the phonetic or syntactic result, in verbal or written form (there is the sub-vocalized form of syntax, which has three distinct forms at the basic level, which may be arbitrarily and naturally integrated at any point in super-cognition, which are the mental auditory form, which is formal and controlled, that is, not 'schizophrenic,' and then its raw archetypal form, or as kid might call it 'mental picture form,' and then the purely logical form, which is very clear and lucid and usually brings one to be teeming with joy and happiness, especially if they are a philosopher of some sort), however, these are not very useful for asserting themself into sociological form, as they stay internalized, and are rarely externalized. I admit, that this will be more difficult to read, if you are familiar with Chomsky, as he does a "syntax-outward," approach, and starts his syntactical epistemology off syntax itself, with very little phenomenal-cognitive tacit support, in his explanations on how cognition is transmitted and transduced into syntax, while this one speaks of the ranges of the basic forms of the phenomena of the mind as a whole, and then offers how syntax is derived, in an almost synthetic a prior, unto an a posterior manner. All Assertions Are A Heavily, If Not Purely Tacit Activity When one asserts anything, in any given condition, situation, or pre-text, they must swab out their entire tacit knowledge, database. It is a comprehensive pulse of info-cognitive potential and the most necessary integration's of knowledge, which are felt in anticipation, for the needed response, in a teleological fashion, that is to say, in accordance to what ones deepest goals are (for the Christian, it is the Kingdom of God, and for the Muslim, the final Jihad). Every statement, which is asserted, which is pantomimed out while asserted, or even normative and responsible, non-verbal action, in response to anything, heavily requires the actualization, utilization, and furthermore, integration of ones tacit knowledge. All assertions, require a form of hope, and grand utility of mind and heart, where one may strictly have the confidence to adhere to ones purely integrative result, in response to ones subsidiary focal experience, and express themselves properly, and responsibly, accordingly to the situation as a whole, in which is at present (or in the eternal, for the spiritual individual). All syntax, is derived from tacit knowledge, whether formed in the moment from a synthetic a priori means of integration, or by any other means of integration, which results in tacit knowledge. Tacit knowledge may be accurately rendered in the moment, at the meta-level, in a high functioning and utilitous manner, apart from the void, in a responsible manner, which allows for a responsible, spiritually self-sacrificial, and Will of God esque mode-of-thought, allowing for on to actively act upon it, in all situations. Thus, one may always assert the Will of God, from tacit knowledge imbued by the Trinity, onto a physical, emotional, or syntactical assertion (there are many other types of assertions as well). All Syntax, Is In Itself Knowledge All syntax is, is a form of discrete a mathematical referencing system, in a real metaphysical-transcendent, visual, auditory, sensual, and concrete forms, which do not change over time, in their general genus, however, the sub-specie of font, may. Every single words in the universe,refer the mind to something concrete, and even spiritual. Albeit, these references are usually unconscious, in the mind of the apprehend-er or internalizer of said syntax, and also the implicit or explicit integration's of such. Syntax and Bi-Cognominalism It is actually a quite simple, and down to earth mode of philosophy, and allows for a means to explore all things, in an extremely meta-responsible manner. So, at its very genesis, syntax can be pre-actualized, in a babies mind, as an a posterior, to the chemical degree, of being geometrically conduced to the physical or phonetic forms of syntax structure, allowing for the proto-genesis of syntax to be conformed to by the folding proteins of the mirror neurons, unto the Occipital Lobes renderings of the syntax, in image forms, and auditory forms of the phonetic data, to be concretely rendered in the mind, as an epigenetic a priori operation, which at this state is present mainly by the perichoretically shaped genes and such. This allows for the epigenetic renderings of the individual, and their mind, to have discrete genetically rendered styles of internalization, and sets the basic tone of the individuals ability to relate with syntax, or words, whether written or verbalized, and thus implicitly their whole life track. It would be wise, if you are a parent, to set your child on a responsible and strong existential tract, therefore, feed them responsible and nourishing syntax, lest you bereave them of the pinnacle nature of mankindë as a whole, which is to say, Words. Now here is a brief philosophical epistemology, from a Triune God outwards version, of how our minds form, with the inclusion of syntax into bi-cognominalism. Since all action here, is a priori, and situational, one requires one of two things to develop unto a Christian mind, either (a) the direct influence of the Holy Spirit of God, upon the individual, or (b) access to the Word of God, whether through Church, community, charity, intuition, curiosity, or divine ordinance upon such an individual. Since most individuals are born directly into an a posterior Christian family, they then have direct access to the Word of God, and the Holy Spirit, and thus the mind of Christ can form extremely well in these spiritually well-off individuals. However, many individuals are not born into Christian families, and are born using poor means of cognitio, apart from the "mind of Christ," which causes in post-modernity, an anachronistic, and void like mind and existentialism, which usually directly purports itself to an immanent death of the spirit, by succumbing the value of health versus the void, unless one intuitively learns a posterior, to become a man or woman of responsibility, and thus defeats the void, out of recognition of ones human-hood on earth, and has thus taken responsibility for such, having a form of common a priori mind of Christ, present, which may not be spiritual, but has the same style of subsidiary focal integration, unto an a fortiori of lifestyle of responsibility, allowing individuation to take place, and one to progress teleologically upwards, in their life pursuits, though it be spiritually deficient, and morally vague, it can still work. That is one the one directive of God, upon mankinde, before man ate of the fruit, and thus if one is at least working responsibly, then they will have all the non-posteriori Christ fruits, such as a responsible value system, and joy, and a fairly well developed emotional range, and minute theological acumen, and borderline spiritual actualization, which is most likely poorly differentiated, in its image form, at best. Archetypal Form Archetypal forms, even animals are dependent on these forms, for their ability to survive, though they usually feel a form of minute instinctual pleasure towards what forms are present, if they serve a responsible and almost orderly function in which God has ordained, and usually interact with the substantive, real, and concrete forms, such as food, in empirical manners, and cannot imaginatively or tacitly describe them using any words, really. However, at the human level, because we use syntax structure, there must be a direct appropriation of these archetypal forms, whether they are substantive and concrete and visio-cognitively rendered, in either the unconscious visio-spatial field of the spiritual individual whom is focused on higher processes and such, and living "in the Kingdom of God, if a true, and responsible a posterior grace, Christian, and then have a syntax structure, in which one has learned by means of telic recursion, in order to attach the proper syntax structure, to the proper, and real substantive object, which the syntax syntactically determinates with itself, and refers to. Then, there is the "formal form," which is the internal abstraction of an external form, so it is mentally re-constructed into sensual-image and mental form, of the actual object. I say, sensual image, as in dreams, when these objects are interacted with, they can be felt, as if they were felt in real life, by ones responsibly functioning sense organs, because that is how the nervous system acts, as being perfect microcosms. It is pro-substantive, and almost a posterior substantive, in that, it is known in the individual, and actively integrated into ones pre-syntax tacit knowledgebase. The proper syntax is then appropriated, eventually, in ones responsible existential, and probably syntax synthetic a priori existential path, where eventually learns what a thing, or form whether substantive or formal is called syntactically, and thus appropriates ones proper syntax structure, with said forms, whether substantive or formal. Sentential Logic Logic allows for this direct access of form, at its most basic levels, in manners which are responsible towards an a fortirior and individuative esque life path, which allows for the most functional forms to be readily accessed in their physiological manner, until the higher processes such as the spiritual or deep existential processes become probablized, in which one needs to get their most basic needs upward, met. The direct access and mediation of these forms, in the most responsible and organized manner, as to accommodate ones needs or primordially intuitive goals. However, as being made in the image of God, these things come naturally and arbitrarily, as we are not animals in the sense of being evolutionary epigenetic phenomena over a period of billions of years, as the CTMU theory, by Christopher Langan, has successfully defended the statement of, and genuine faith would only increase ones refutation and resentment of such things. The more logic one has, the easier syntax and archetypal form is integrated, or for that matter accessed, in direct manners. This allows for a posteriori knowledge to become tacitly integrated at a fast pace, and limits the ability to say that we are animals, thanks to such things.Glory be to God, for making us in His image, and not some random angels, which may have rendered our minds much more useless and irresolute in their innate ability! So, a rebuff. Sentential logic, at this level, merely points syntax, which is tacitly integrated, with its archetypal form, whether substantive and concrete in external reality, or the formal form, which is the abstraction of such forms, in mental pictures, to be organized with one another, in very quick, direct, linear, and appropriate, and mentally responsible manners. Up to here, all knowledge is still technically a priori, and at an almost beastial level, which if one is stuck in the void, out of faithlessness, irresponsibility, and other such woeful phenomena, they will be stuck here, and can only render atoms of reason and/ or knowledge. Syntax Tree Tacit Integration's All which has been organized up to this point, is a form a of synthetic a priori, basic human and tacit knowledge, however, as being made in the image of God predicates, we must become like Him indefinitely, in order to accurately conform moreso into His image. Thus the need for organizing syntax forms at a slightly more grand and meta-level becomes present, and since I am a concrete and down to earth philosopher, and theologian, I must admit, that there are really only syntax trees, which are able to integrate syntax and this basic knowledge, at this point. Syntax, becomes questioned of its own accord, minutely, and one starts to begin to differentiate the archetypal forms form each others, now, and the sentential logic becomes far more refined, and becomes able to dress all of cognition, and syntax in more proper direct relation with one another. That is to say, at this point of bi-cognal development of the individual, one is able to break the bounds of strictly a form of naturalistic or empirical existentialism, and one is thus able to actualize higher processes of the innate human nature. Archetypal Form Syntax tree integration's, may integrate multiple forms and their explicit or implicit syntax forms together, to form valid a priori "statements," which are grammatically unaffected, and thus cannot form legible sentences usually (true schizophrenics have their mind disorganized as such, which is why their speech is usually disorganized, but may be quickly re-ordered by loving and respectful spiritual conversation, in which one imparts them healing wisdom and such, or even reading would help the schizophrenics mind return to a viable, and normatively organized threshold of functionality). The syntax tree, which would be able to logically assert many archetypal forms, whether substantive, or formal, into the situation, and their syntax forms, would then allow for a form of cognitive situation to become actualized, and that is the beginning of ones ability to become aware of ones own situation as a whole, in order to responsibly act upon it. These trees, because they can be tacitly organized and internalized in their form, in themselves, in order to be constructed, and meta-statized at the meta level and integrated with other syntax trees, are able to form a posterior knowledge, at a very neat and yet fundamentally basic level. Sentential Logic The role sentential logic has a this point, of syntax trees, is mainly of finding the correct syntax to integrate with the archetypal forms, allowing for such things to be integrated rapidly. The more rapid the better. This allows for syntax integration to become present, as well, because syntax trees, in themselves, innately need syntax integration's to become trees, and the forms, and syntax to become attached to one another in groups, in almost a Lockian knowledge theory esque, effort. The rapid integration of syntax, and forms, and syntax and forms, into the syntax tree structures, allows one to tacitly internalize the ability to innately and arbitrarily do such things, as a per-formative mental skill, in which any single individual could will at any time, given that the conditions of having adequate neurology and mental resource are met. Once this brief and difficult journey to describe is finished, a whole new world appears for the individual, for truly, one can now actualize the Word of God at this point, and be saved, and faith may be present (there is an a priori Word based faith, instigated by the Spirit of God, but it is a different form of the Word, in which God instills in many individual who are disabled in order to save them, praise be to the Lord Most High!) Posterior Syntax Integration Up to here, we had the ability to create syntax-structure, and its relation with with various domains of reality, external of the mind, in the cosmos and heavens, or in the Imagos, as a whole, and internal to the mind, and how such domains interact with one another, before knowledge of syntax, in itself, as itself apart from simply being an a priori and arbitrary means to communicate with one another as creatures of God, as human beings, but, since we can abstract words in themself, thanks to the post-structuralist movement, and Noam Chomsky, it is now possible, to be on the other side of words, which is to say, a posteriori. Once one has mastered the domain of syntax, in itself, and become syntax a posterior, that is when the truly clever and poetic masterpieces of syntactically derived wonders may become achieved. In authors, such as G.K. Chesterton, with extreme wit, are a posterior syntax, they are able to create extremely genius integration of syntax, to accommodate syntax structure, with unique syntax structure which tacitly integrates knowledge of syntax in itself, and the surrounding words and grammars and such, even unto the pragmatic level of syntax which explores vast relations of syntax structure in relation to one another, to create unique play on words, and morphological sentence and grammar structure which accommodates the heart of such an a posterior syntax individual. With the inclusion of the tacit knowledge of syntax, and the transformational rules of grammar at the meta-level, one is able to create truly brilliant syntax structure and such, even with syntax's such as math, and internal reason. When one is a posterior syntax, truth becomes a lot clearer, and easier to derive and assert of its own accord, in the syntacticians mind and heart, and love for others, in a responsible manner, hopefully conducing itself unto the Will of Jehovah! For what is truth, but syntax structure which accurately expresses something properly and correctly, in syntax form, be it other syntax forms, real Imago-genic structure, cognitive structure, the motions of such, archetypal forms, and everything else in between. Truth When one is posterior syntax, it becomes a lot easier to express truth, quickly, easily, and properly, also responsibly, for in order to reach posterior syntax, one must have allotted unto themself the time and energy to mediate archetypal forms, and sentential logic,unto tacit knowledge, in its vivid and mental relation with syntax in itself, allowing for truth-value structure to be consistently apprehended and internalized in its direct forms of relationship with the Imagos, and the mental faculties of the mind. This allows one to correctly know, in their tacit knowledge, how to derived truth easily from their subsidiary tacit knowledge and active integration's of reality, with their inner world and such. Thus, the ability to express the true and concrete structure of all things becomes a reality available option, be it that what is being described is spiritual, concrete, emotional, imaginative, or other such, which may be encapsulated unto tacit knowledge. The truth form, of all things, whether external or internal becomes actively integrated into ones tacit knowledgebase and the reality of the individual is made very pure and sane. This usually comes along the tract of faith, after one has sought the higher gifts after a while, and achieved the gift of prophecy, whether as a situational and divine appropriation of divine revelation unto conversation, or as career esque mode of divine existential-syntactical responsible assertion unto the community and unto creation as a whole. At this point, basic truth structure and form may be asserted unto syntax form, but not usually at the meta-level, until one has become posterior truth-integration, in which one may actively assert and actualize truth structure at the meta-level, and actively integrate truth-structure in all forms, at the meta-level, rendering a creativity of truth, and allowing a truly Godly "sicit deus" esque operation to take place, where one is a sub-creator of reality, in that they are responsibly taking truth into account, and asserting it in their respective sociological environments. Posterior Truth-Integration Once one has actualized and internalized the bi-cognitive-syntactic means of triangulating truth values, statements, the ability to synthetically derive them with much ease as an innate function to the mind of the being in question, then one is able to become posterior truth integration, and is able to begin to integrate truth at the meta-level, allowing one to create textures of truth-value and true syntactical structures at the meta-level, being integrated with each other in a fashion which brings a form of functional utility to the individual, accordingly to the existential, situational, and authoritative parameters of the individuals mind, heart, being and will, which if grounded unto the Word of God by faith, will do so accordingly unto God's Will. Once one has tacitly internalized and acknowledge the posterior truth integration structure, at the norm or meta-level, one is able to tacitly and arbitrarily organize such things, at sudden need, and such. Posterior Truth-Checking To be safe from falsehood, the mind has many natural defense mechanisms from lies, which are all inhibited when one is lusting, sinning, around wicked community, or is in a state of whoredom, and is extremely guilty in their conscience. Thus one has been given by God, then innate faculty of "truth-checking," which allows one to tacitly check and re-check their syntax a truth structures, to be sure that they are truthful, in of themself, before articulation and such (unless one is deceptive, and gas lights, or purposefully lies to achieve ones own ends and such). This posterior truth checking faculty is usually internalized and rendered in ones tacit knowledge database, so that they may actively seek to "truth check," and in so doing, becomes posterior truth checking. Grammar Integration Syntax, in itself, is useless, unless processed by the grammar rules of the surrounding culture of the individual, unto the organization of true and proper, and grammatically conducive to the surrounding cultures language and grammar structure, culturally expressive and "proper form." The truth which is now derived tacitly, in syntax form, and in all the other forms, must go through the process of becoming culturally integrated, in an active an arbitrarily social means of expression of truth. Much give and take, must be present or one is going to become a bore, or shame others with their prose for too long, and much love, respect, and attention must be paid to the individual or group whom is listening to you express such things, and thus an active integration of ones values of the heart such as love, attention, or respect must be present and actively integrated unto ones experience, and projected out onto the individual or group in question, or else they may lose interest, or will feel aggressive at the lack of respect or love present. A woman's deepest need is love, and a mans is respect, though both require a form of attention. Now grammar is the rules which define where words go in sentences and syntax strings, and are thus either verbalized in a hopefully perfectly organized manner in accordance with the subsidiary cultures grammar rules, or written.Once the grammar of the culture one is apart of at the time of articulation and truth-syntactical expression, is mastered, then it may integrated into ones tacit knowledge base, and one may thus internalize it and become a proper "truth-speaker," in that particular culture, at any given point or time. Most of these processes, are ideally, done naturally, by the unconscious in some, but in others who are not as well socialized, may require a lot of work, responsibility, and shameless ability to move forward in an existential and social manner. :) Posterior Grammar Integration with Truth Once one has become posterior grammar integration with truth, in a tacit manner, they are able to responsibly, at any time, render a statement or series of syntactical strings of truthful words, which allow one to indefinitely speak truth, unless the posterior grammar integration with truth is somehow damaged by sin, the wickedness of the community or other individuals, and other such phenomena which are sourced by the devil are present. However, posterior grammar integration with truth allows for this fundamental ability to master other cultures grammars and such, and thus be able to assert truth-structure in syntax form at the cultural meta-level, to a normative, and responsible mean which is usually a median of grammatical values and structure of grammar rules which allow the truth speaker to grammatically form sentences which are able to be understood by many different cultures at once, and their particular grammar, rendering a form of multi-cultural truth grammar, to be present. This allows one to express themself accurately and truthfully, and responsibly in any given culture, at any given time, if much practiced, and responsibly internalized into ones tacit knowledge base, though the ability to master a cultures grammar is situation-ally co-dependent, and relative to the domain of the individual in question, in regards to what the nearest culture is (all cultures have a distinct grammar ruling structure, but each may be actualized and mastered with relative ease over time, different languages however are a little bit more tedious to organize and such, if one is not a steady and well-off linguist of some sort) Posterior Syntactical-Ontic Skimming and Shaving Once one is "posterior grammar integration with truth," and they have tacitly known and internalized this innate ability of the syntactical genius to do so, they are then at ill-ease, until they are able to a meta-fact and meta-syntax-truth check, which actively checks all facts which are already established in a particular domain of culture, or of the culture as a whole itself, and thus the need for an ontic skimming and shaving of the probably already valid syntax and grammar rules, which are true and rendered responsibly in communication, in order that one may assert truth, at the meta-level, in a manner which is posterior grammatically integrated with truth, in order for their expression of truth to be seamless, and perfectly integrated, without an ad infinitum of syntax expression, to be present. Thus one must take great care, that ones perfect organization of truth-syntax, with the true grammar rules, and such, are not over done as to over-bear the listener of ones syntax, whether written, or verbalize (or in sign languages motioned, or sensuously organized as physical touches and shapes of the physiology of the individual communicating). Once one has mastered the posterior syntactical-ontic skimming and shaving, then one is able to seamlessly assert truth, in a grammatically perfect manner, until either their mind burns out of dysregulation of ones assertions (as is present with too many American women, a joke!), or one simply is exhausted of their emotional, or mental energy, and thus needs to seek peace, responsibly and rest for a time, in order to recuperate. This may be tacitly integrated, allowing for the ability to actualize and master the whole continuum of tacit knowledge in itself, and allows for the perfect means to synthetically express oneself as an individual, in a factual, or true manner of speaking, at any time, and any where. Syntactical Focal Expression The "syntactical focal expression" or the SFE for short, is the Polanyian, Chomkian, Hairstonian, tri-fold integration of the innate syntax-truth structure of the mind, being actively transmutated unto the existential, situational, and authoritative parameters of the mind of the individual, into what needs to be said or articulated in the moment, according to the subsidiary focal integration's syntactical cues, of which must be responsibly asserted accordingly to the subsidiary focal integration's focal point of the individual. After one has mastered such, one may assertively respond appropriately to anything, at anytime, anywhere, in any given situation, and if one is knowledgeable enough, it allows for strong wisdom to be asserted and present in any conversation, at any where, any place, and anytime (with really only the strict barrier of language, however, if one learns the language which is yet a priori, the same principles above may be tacitly integrated with that specific language in question, and one may tacitly integrate such a new language, and master it in the exact same manner as to be a truth-speaker in that language as well, and in the cultures which are present which require that particular language, and their grammars may be mastered in the same manners as well, so that one is a responsible individual in that culture, hopefully working for the salvation of others, in such places of other language based culture). Love and Syntactical Focal Expression It is best articulated out of a heart of love for others, so that it is expressed gently, AND lovingly, and therefore, truthfully, out of a heart of spiritual self-sacrifice, and best received unto community of spiritual love, so that it is received in its true form, for "love believes all things, and is fooled by nothing." Spiritual love is the only form of love that does not seek to dominate that which it loves, and is therefore, the a posteriori, ultimatum of "man-in-obedience-to-God," to perform. To add, anything which is spoken outside a heart of spiritual self-sacrifice, or a spirit of love for others, usually invalidates itself at the grand level of Godliness, so it would be wise to go ahead a delay gratification, in order to do such, so that it is in God's Will, and therefore responsible in His Holy eyes, and able to help build the Kingdom of God, truth syntactical brick after brick. Comments are closed.
|
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |