Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction
I'd like to start off this essay, by saying, that this essay, nor any of the others, are personal vindictive remarks towards objectivists whom have hurt me personally (and many have, as we will discuss the phenomenology of how this is possible later in this essay), but rather, my personal and naive attempts at a mildly serious refutation of the things in which I seek to slice apart with the spiritually imputed sword of truth. Now this essay will contain many remarks of the deception of objectivism, in its relation with actual truth and reality (first pillar of objectivism destroyed first, and the rest, I shall destroy as well) and why it can be extremely damaging to society, Christians, and everyone who gets caught up in a relationship where they have now become an "object." May the weightiest object win, and may the truth be distilled in these words in which I humbly and self-sacrificially, through much pain of the Spirit, speak. The Worst Object of All: Objectivism One might think from the outcries of women, and from the now observable slow disintegration of Western society, into a Godless void, that there might be some faint idea, of why objectifying everything, including humans, God, women, men, and money, might seem a bit sacrilegious to the goal of creating a better world, but, as goes with the Christian doctrine of total depravity, if not validating it wholly, humans just do not got a clue, and keep spiraling down the void of self-love and self-interest, and trying to seek restless Machiavellian gain, where one should be living peacefully in harmony and community with one another, out of the value of "love for another," or from the spoken command of God, to "love thy neighbor." The First Pillar, The False Self Assertion into Godhood The absolutist axioms which Ayn Rand presented, were derived from the human logos, but falsely proclaimed to be the Godly Logos, and thus provided this extremely deceptive beginning to a new philosophy, which claimed Godhood over all, for mere men, and falsely justified self-interest, at the expense of faith, culture, self-sacrifice, and actual truth. As bold and intellectually innovative as these claims were, it seems that they lack any further justification, at merely risking the isolation of the individual from community, at the false providence which Ayn Rand has bestowed and callously inserted her philosophy upon mankinde as a whole. While I greatly admire Ayn Rand's clarity of articulation, and her beauty of heart, innate truth-value assertion, and such, it very much seems as if her philosophy, as a whole, insidiously omits the foundation of all actual truth, whom is Jesus Christ. Now the mathematical revolution of philosophy greatly influenced her thought, and system, and provided her with a cohesive philosophy, which at its core, in terms of logic 'alone,' is intrinsically valid, in some areas, giving it the ability to give it some reduced, and yet somewhat sterile, ontological force. However, her inability to provide a valid syntax epistemology and meta-physic alone could invalidate her philosophy as a whole, as being even 'relatively' close to a form of "absolute truth," and thus has committed itself unto a meta-physical fallacy (and technically ad ignorantium, by not further investigating the axioms absolutism, in the presence of clear truth) by denying any true form of spirituality and genuine metaphysical ontological-transcendent mechanism, birthed by faith in Jesus alone. The result is, a form of mathematical deception, which allows one to mathematize the Imagos, and its structure and creatures of very docile orientation and loving predispositions, into little objects, which are merely disposable at the gratifying whim of the "objectivists." The Phenomenology of the Destructive Aspects of Objectivism When an objectivist comes along in ones existential meanderings of the Imagos, it is too often, that one becomes a victim. The phenomenology is clearly articulable, and I shall attempt to deliver it here. The objectivist, sees other human beings as objects, that is to say, a form of mathematical concept to be used arbitrarily for the ends of the objectivist, for the value of self-interest, and self-aggrandizement. This denies the individuals right to "I-hood," or even being a creature of God, and denies its right to live as a creature of God, in the Imagos. This is an ultimate form of trespass against another individual, and leads to frustration, if the object does not "perform its function," as being a disposable means to the objectivists ends. When these frustrations build up, and the objectivist comes across a strong personality, with strong value-oriented boundaries, and an aristocratic predisposition, the objectivists becomes a relentless, power hungry, Machiavellianist. The feelings of frustration and powerlessness can compound and turn the individual into a psychopath or "malignant narcissist," (to be used in the philosophical sense), which traits of are: a psychological need for power, ego-syntonic aggression (aggression that feels natural), joyful cruelty, the dehumanization of otherwise normal creatures, undermining with out knowledge, or a priori, and other such wicked and detestable phenomena. These individuals idealize destructive aspects of their ego, and wish to take over the world, and partake in paranoid negative projections, and are considered by Eric Fromm, a prominent social psychologist, to be "symbolically representative of the quintessence of evil." Generally, objectivists, are weak personalities, with a strong selfish ambition, and are mostly white middle class males, with a general callous unconcern for the well being of others. This is damaging. When one gets caught up in a relationship with this type of individual, their life is usually destroyed systematically. I have been victimized by many of these individuals in the modern Protestant Church, and many of them exhibited a readiness to kill, which one would expect out of a serial killer (which malignant narcissism is usually the psychological modus operandi of the serial killer, and crime syndicate leaders). At a sociological scale, this creates a community of destructive capabilities, seeing themself as doing good, loyal towards one another, and yet, and yet fundamentally spreading wickedness and deceit upon all whom come across. It can become extremely destructive to society, if unregulated, and may very well cause the death of the Church, in the modern Protestant culture, if not immediately cast out like the demon ideology it is. Objectivism, and Truth: Opposites or Unequivocally Equivocal as Truth Truth, it seems, is more or less, syntax structures, which accurately represent external reality, or aspects of the Imagos (the fundamental image of that which is, both the visio-concrete essence of the cosmos and heavens), while going through the process of the individuals mind, of internalizing external realities, into image form, and the grammar-logic-language process, of being morphologically transmutated into warranted syntactical form, or "proper syntax," as I like to assert the "proper name" of. Objectivism, hails the formation of these grammars, as conforming to the grammar of objectivist, and thus the cognitive-syntactical structures are brunted into becoming concrete mathematical idealizations, in which one has a form of concrete identification of, before they can ever be apprehended in their internal form, as they are. This causes innate deception, and a complete lack of the ability to realize internal or external reality as it is, thus causing one to form perceptions which are very one-dimensional, mathematically retarded, emotionally detached, and by all means, inhuman. Christ would be screaming at the Churches which embody this philosophy, as it destroys any existentialism, which is potentiated and regulated by faith in Jesus Christ. It thus, is apparent, that one may not even "enter the Kingdom," as result, and one, if an objectivist, can only be a Pharisee, if not a malignant Pharisee, while adhering to the actual philosophical precepts of objectivism. Thus, one could say, that objectivism, is neither truly untruth, nor truth, in itself as a whole, though many logic's would deny its partisanship into truth-hood, because it commits the fallacies as a whole, of being meta-physically and ontologically deficient (and transcendentally dead) in its ability to interlocute spiritual phenomena, and the ad ignorantium, which presumes the axioms are truth, without any further investigation, a priori, and it is thus a form of selfish selective truth (in very discrete areas), but because of its focus on barren abstractions alone, renders it a reductio ad absurdum, committing itself unto infinite self-aggrandizement, and the likely implicit destruction of the self and the community. It is by all means a condemned philosophy, set for destruction by the Will and Hand of Jesus, and His Spirit. A.Introduction I think we all have had that certain individual, whom is more comfortable with mystery, is reckless, and likes to undermine perceptions. The psychology of modern day, would like to attribute to them the degrading term "sociopath," and philosophy could only expand this in a slightly more humanizing way as, one whom not "being for others," but is "being for their-self," in a possible extremest fashion, to the point of societies detriment. This essay is here to treat the issue of perception, why certain theologically a posteriori individuals may call these types of individuals "satanically corrupted," why they undermine other individuals perception, and how to strengthen your perception and the perception of others, so that other individuals are not defining your, or maybe your loved ones reality, and they or you can live life without being sucked into someones false reality that they are trying to weave for you, in the name of something as stupid, fruitless, and temporal as self-gratification and self-gain (quite embarrassing, on all accounts, if you ask anyone with knowledge of such things). The Perception: What Is It? It (the perception of an individual) is merely the integrated focal point of their experience, where various forms of consciousness, being, emotions, soul, body, and cognition are regulated and organized, unto the PPoI, or "perceptual point of interest." It, I think, is a bit more than what the mind is attentive towards, but rather the field of inter-locution, which is created from the complex synthesis of the above phenomena, and processes. Much of it is concrete, non-objectively true, and yet has psychical and emotional phenomena appropriated unto such things in which is presented into the individuals "PPoI." I will go ahead and do the dirty work, delay gratification, and list the phenomenology of perception, using my home grown knowledge theory, which is outlined briefly in the first "TTIS" (The Truth Is Simple) post on "How Secular Knowledge May Be Integrated With Christian Knowledge - A Primer," which once clicked will open a new window. Only the forms have extrinsic substance, which directly correlates with its counterpart in the mind, which is the re-creation of the form mentally, as an archetypal form. All the other faculties are parts of the image of God, God has bestowed upon man to use responsibly. Now we internalize the the syntax and logic, and forms of others, once they either have articulated such things, or we have comprehended by means of human empathy, without them directly expressing such things. The perception, is that field of mind, which may reflect both internally intrinsically in the human being, and explore and abstract within, or reflect outwards unto the Imagos (an idea which contains both the cosmos and the heavens) and explore and abstract such things and intra-trans-mutate such things into logical form, into syntactical (word or math form), phonetic form (verbal language, spoken, but not written), and may infinitely organize such things to create ones perception. Obviously, there can be bounds to this, or there can not be bounds to this, though other individuals may see you as a visionary, nut case, brilliant theologian, or even a schizophrenic. Of course, these views would be dependent on their concrete, and often valid states. This can create perfect individualism, or it can create perfect community (hopefully one day this will be present), it all depends on the heart, and how self-sacrificial such ones heart will will itself to be. The heart is mainly responsible for the general organizational tract that these things organize unto, and if it is a good heart, it will will the being to organize such things unto good behavior, and imagination that leads to altruism and such. A faithful heart in Jesus, organizes such things according to God's Word and Will, and not arbitrary, sterile, and often times unstable organizations the faithless heart might, in regards to the above phenomena. The will, thus, must be the general and foundational organizing functor of the being, which is mastered only by the heart itself, and if faithful to Jesus, conforms itself not to the will of the self, but to the Will of the Father in Heaven, as revealed by divine revelation in Christ. Thus, perception, could be boiled down to, as social creatures, the rendered field of consciousness, which is the result of a process in which ones heart has willed the being to internalize forms, values, logic, syntax, and the results thereof, into a transmogrifically organized state, which is an individuals perception. According to my subsidiary model, or rather borrowed subsidiary model from Polanyi, an individual who has faith, would eventually have it regulated by the Triune God, in accordance with existential, authoritative, and situation boundaries, conforming to the central integration known as the subsidiary focal integration, destroying hyper-individualism, and hyper-subjectivity at its core, and replacing the Western value of self-love, with the value of self-sacrifice for others, and becoming re-created by the Word of God. Of course, this would eventually morph into God's perception, or more humanly, Christs perception, and would thus allow the re-creation of the "mind of Christ," at the level in which Paul expressively stated that we would have it (1 Corinthians 2:16), as Christians. But this is good news, and yes, slavery to Jesus and to God, and His Will, but, we are His Creatures to begin with, not random endo-morphic images, which is the only true, realistic, and down-to-earth alternative to orthodox Christian theism (which is far more spiritually enlightening and comprehensive predicating genuine life on earth as it is in heaven, say I and Christ). It does have an interpersonal aspect, which if not abused, which it almost always is nowadays, in which the "PPoI" field becomes appropriated by the being, body, emotions, values, logic, and syntax (both written and phonetic of others) of other individuals, however, the heart chooses what is internalized and what is not. This comes in handy with deceitful individuals, as one who has mastered their heart, may choose not to internalize their deceit, and may live a better and more wise life. Why and How Do Other Individuals Undermine It? The most common means of undermining other individuals perceptions, is what is called in psychology, "gas lighting." It is a form of mental abuse, in which information is spinned or selectively omitted, in order to favor the abuser. It causes the victim to depend on the abuser whom is gas lighting, for their definition of reality, giving the abuser enormous levels of control over the victim. Now satan is the father of lies and half-truths, and this phenomena could be theologically abstracted to say, that those whom gas-light are satanically corrupted, and are serving satan, in that, they are reflecting his image and character perfectly by doing such things, and thus such individuals could be said to be "servants of satan," or the humanistic approach would say "satanically corrupted." The truth is, this phenomena is really just satan clawing and creating lies through his minions so that one turns away from Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the truth and Word Incarnate. Once one has been gas lighted for long enough, all of their perceptual faculties and the fruits there of, such as self esteem and all individuative structures, become annihilated. It causes a form of death, of the internal world of the victim, and the only things which survive after "perfect gas lighting," are the soul, a broken down heart, and the body. Basic instinct becomes damaged, and the individual must now crawl to survive, as much of human existence, requires the faculties of the mind, to be functioning at a high level, arbitrarily organizing much phenomena. The why is answered by the who, and their spiritual state, which if they are actually gas lighting purposely, means that they have willfully submitted to satan, in some manner, and may develop a malignant personality structure or such, and thus their spiritual state is likely, devil-centric, and dead, raised back to life only by strong Christians, and the Word and Grace of God, breaking the demons and devils hold on that individual, and destroying that individuals will to willfully serve satan. I mean 'breaking' their will. Refusing to trust other individuals, presenting false information, lying, and generally using information to negate the informational structure of other individuals (information being defined as syntax, external or intrinsic forms, logic, etc, and the organization thereof) are all forms of gas lighting, and just trying to create doubt, where none is necessary. It is systematically destroying and exploiting the psyche and mental faculties of others, or basically hacking their internal higher process based nervous system states. Much like the Flood (to use a Halo parallel, a perfect one I like to call a "Christian Archetypal Parallel") in Halo, which hacks the nervous system of its prey, to the Flood's will as a whole (which is to dominate and assimilate all life, capturing the broader meta-physical aspects of sin in relation to the devil, and humans individually and collectively, in a perfect manner mind you), which is no bueno, nichts gut, or if you are Italian, no bono, if you ask me. How to Strengthen It Since faith does not guide, but merely asserts in a teleologically conducive manner to the Will of God, I must say that reading a book by a Prophet is always the best way to build any form of mental, psychical, moral, or spiritual integrity. Thus I will compile a short list of all the Prophets I know off of the top of my head, so that, if you the reader were interested, you could buy any one of their books, and feel what I am feeling, and build that comprehensive internal integrity which I so joyfully asserted. Otherwise, reading in general, depending on the person that the author was, will help you strengthen your perception in regards to their specific area of skill, be it linguistics, psychology, spirituality, morality, and etc. Faith in Jesus will allow you to be nourished by the Word, and if you read the Bible, the divine to individual structural integrity of the internal world will have extremely high levels of internal integrity, which will over flow into your external life of sociability to help build the Kingdom of God, because it is so divinely inspired. Also, the process of logical clarification may help, the love of others, the love for others, being in responsible community, going to a responsible Church, reading some more, playing an instrument you have mastered, and can play off muscle memory (if your perception is down, this may be a useless activity, and you will probably be struggling to organize your mind to play or think about chords). Validating emotions may help, as well as responsibly working and working to succeed in completing basic, and normative tasks as to build confidence and ego integrity. The List of Prophets Are as Follows: G. K. Chesterton J. R. R. Tolkien C. S. Lewis George MacDonald Dietrich Bonhoeffer Karl Barth St. Augustine St. Francis Athanasius of Alexandria Fyodor Dostevesky Stanley Hauerwas Martin Luther Jonathan Edwards Soren Kiekergaard John Calvin Martin Luther King Jr. Ellen G. White Alasdair MacIntyre? A.W. Tozer Thomas Merton Leo Tolstoy Fuller Sheen Oswald Chambers Introduction The limits all physics is constrained to, in all concrete reality, is a cognitive to cosmos asymptotic appropriation, in a 'hopefully' concrete manner, in regards to the cosmos itself, and the description of the cosmos and its subset objects, in the language of math and a grammatically conducive language to the individual whom is physicizing, to explain the implicit math of the thought, into common language . This means that the bounds of the ability of physics to describe anything, is the cosmos itself. This is extremely disappointing, as I would want a math that could describe anything. The wildly accepted thesis of the big bang has become the most widely accepted doctrine in any culture, apart from the trinity in the orthodox culture of Christians. This is an admonished, and unfortunate event, though none apart from the militant intellectuals of the world know why. The idea of the big bang, seems to me, to be a mathematically derived idea, of a self-justifying nominalism that is reminiscent of the behavior of a Godless and self-justifying individual, than it is of good mathematics. The truth is, the idea of the big bang, could easily be refuted with the idea of the big bag, which I will explain below. The Big Bag I think that I could get away with saying, that the mind is much like a big bag. It collects things. Apart from simply collecting things, it breaks things down, and synthesizes them, and puts those things into words. The mind is capable of abstracting anything, and putting those abstractions into a form of syntax, that is, a written language using symbols to express a mutually identifiable cognitive form, abstraction, logic, syntax, or the collection of. It takes actual objects, and phenomena, and recreates it in "archetypal form," that is, a mental picture or pattern of the real object or phenomena (or collection thereof). Then the forms are usually either stored as they are, appreciated, depreciated, loved, hated, or aesthetizied towards the point of idolatry, or even scorned and emptied of any subjective value that an individual may place on such a theoretical object or phenomena. Usually, in the mind of the intellectual, further discourse is needed, and further intellection needs to be taken place, or else they may feel empty or dry, and maybe even guilty, so these forms get shifted over into the other part of the mind,responsible for breaking things down by the laws of either Socratic logic, or mathematical and modal logic, and these forms get organized accordingly. If that wasn't enough, the real creative folk of the realm of the modern intellectuals, seem to also go a step further,and translate these organized states of the cognitive realm, into a form of syntax in poetic manners, resulting in Chesterton esque writers, who can fathom the deepest realms of reality, and with a God-like ease (due to the gift of Prophecy allowing access to the Mind of God), to re-organize these thoughts, forms, logics, in poetic manners, into syntactical structures, with creative and unique grammars, such as the Lewisian prose, or the Tolkienien environment description and character banter in 12th century modes of prose, weaving in and out of meta-thoughts and imagination. Most Prophetic minds, like Bonhoeffer, or Ellen White, and maybe even George MacDonald, are capable of actualizing the entire Imagos, in which the cosmos is the bottom half, and heaven the upper, and the Logos, the true universal syntax, or the Word of God. In reading higher education papers written by Stephen Hawking, his collaborators, and discursively learning about such things over the years, it can be easily concluded that his mind is sterile, and extremely limited in areas of actualization of the Imagos, to the lower half alone, sterilizing his mind from seeing or perceiving the spiritual or heavenly realms, conceding to the fact that his mind is ontologically deficient, however, has extreme sentential logic to syntax capabilities. This allows him to compute what forms he internalizes into extremely abstract and discrete mathematical language, but is limited to the forms of the cosmos, and thus is spiritually blind. Jesus, while having a perfect mind, had a mind to love, and to embody the Will of God, but knew that describing the cosmos, or even the heavens as a comprehensive whole and theory would be useless, without work, and without the Word of God. This is because Jesus could comprehend the whole of reality, and He thus knew laws that Stephen Hawking, in the most intuitively complex reaches of his integration's and imagination, did not know, needed fulfilling and accounting for even though Stephen Hawking was intellectually a priori in regards to such things. Jesus embodied the law of all things, including things mathematical, and laws extended to not merely the cosmos, but to heaven, and took responsibility for all of them. His perfect ontological interlocutor, which helped mediate His mind in relation to reality as a whole, is something, which is imputed to Christians, by faith, and with the work of the Holy Spirit. The Big Bag that is the human mind is capable of internalizing anything, including itself, which makes credence to the fact of faith, that we were in fact made in the image of God, as we reflect the infinitude in which God is, in image form. Image The idea of the image, in the Christian sense, will forever stump physicists with a heavenly stumbling block until the end of time. All cosmos is image, and all heaven is image. We were created in this image, and more specifically, the image of God, was the image of man, before the fall. Man had this fundamental unity with God, as being image sharers, though the fall reduced us to becoming only image bearers, until the Christ came. God, through Christ, allowed us human individuals, a fundamental Imago-genic option, by faith in Jesus, to re-conform to this image, that is God the Father. Humans do the opposite of what God does. Us humans will offer up our own words, which are often barren, formless, and deceitful to the heavens, and almost always in-substantive, while God offers us His Word, in a seemingly (a priori faith,which create spiritual and cosmic blindness often) in-substantive operation, which is made concretely substantive by faith. "The Word became flesh." This means the substantive became human. "The Word was God." This substantive love incarnate, that was also God, that is Jesus Christ, the historical one. The faith roots the heart in this substantive being, whom was Jesus, and thus God's Word is presented for us to internalize by this faith, in that man-God who was Christ. This is the opposite of the human method, as humans will generate grammar relative to this non-God, whom is every man and woman who is not Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the Historical one. Like a computer, which is causated by syntax, into image, this Imagos, was likewise causated. Computers are a primordial sub-microcosm, in a silicone structure. The computers have image, which are called into existence by this syntax, that is computer code. This idea of a pure Imago-genic telic recursion is easy, but self-justification is the devil that will oppose God, and because of this, it becomes a non sequitur in the mind of the self-justifier, that we were not created, even though the creation of the computer is literally a perfect, and teleologically derived form of the human being in silicone form, in its concrete existence in the Imagos. Is it such a stretch of the imagination to imagine such a notion, or such a shrinking of the common ego, to believe in such a thing? A Serious Refutation of the Big Bang Idea All entropy would disagree with the idea of the big bang, but self-justifying and ambiguous logic might confuse the situation. Now it seems like God is simply calling more image from the void, by His Word, than the info-cognitively derived forms of the idea cosmological expansion would like to say. But, because, there is not yet an individual who has internalized the forms of, and transmutated such forms into Socratic or mathematical logic, into a logically conducive syntax which is readily expressed into a higher education culture which could, in a warranted manner, validate the syntax of, it would either be an ad ignoranmium to say that the idea of God calling more form unto creation, or it is an act of comprehending concrete phenomena, which never changes (though our beliefs and forms, and syntax, and logic do) into a culturally conducive language (such as English). The Christian has this upper hand, because they use a direct comprehension to syntax phenomenology to speak and to act, in direct relation to their God, whom is Christ, in which they comprehend His Words and Imagos, and articulate the most necessary syntax as prescribes accordingly to the Truine God's imputationed means of integration (which is perfect) called the subsidiary focal integration, which is a perfect mode of thought, constantly integrating the authoritative, existential, and situational cognition's, with each other, to create the subsidiary focal integration, which allows teleological action to take place, and ontological phenomena to be concretely rendered, by the nature of the Triune integration itself. This, unfortunately, for the scientists, and to the horror of the a priori Christianity scientific community, is in fact a means of perfect thought, in which perfect intelligence is possible, and Plato rolling over in his grave in happiness, towards Jesus, for gifting humanity this perfect means of thought. Conclusion All this said, I would rather trust in the thesis of the faithfully caused mind which is the "big bag," than the thesis of the big bang. For the big bag, which has been re-created by God, in the individual Christians mind, is far more potent, and truth oriented, than any sterile mind could wish to articulate or comprehend, or internalize. That is the result of grace though, and not because of philosophy. Not even this essay can add or subtract value from this big bag, but rather aid in extremely, and almost unjust clarification of such, for the mind that is eternal, and comprehends all as a result of faith by grace, is worthy of only praising the instigator of such a mind, whom is that Triune God. Introduction It is quite simple. It requires a form of post-modern mathematical meta-reasoning, in which one systematically integrates such mathematical prose of abstract and symbolic logic and implicit objects, directly into the mental form of Christ, which is, (after I have given a brief phenomenology of how this form exists and what it exactly is and represents) a form which extends to and perfectly represents Christ Himself mentally (to the point in which it IS Christ), that is, the Word. Thus, when such is given, I shall dialectically enumerate on a possible framework for how all knowledge may be integrated into such a form, and for that matter, what knowledge exactly is. How the Mind Works It (the mind) utilizes two main differentiated faculties at the most basic level of apprehension, but requires another for the more complex faculties. The three are, respectively, sentential logic, archetypal forms, and syntax operations. The sentential logic, is a basic mode of biological math, which allows a teleological upwardness, best expressed in neurology, as the functions responsible for creating functional growth and development of the psyche and cognition. The mind internalizes data from the outside world and reality, and organizes it according the hearts appropriative schemata, which could be anything, be it goals, desires (whether carnal, deceitful, brash, or holy, righteous, and truthful), and other such forms of the heart. The heart is much like the BIOS of the cognitive systems, but also provides a form of ontological (metaphysical) connexion unto the spiritual realm, and it is therefore much like a spiritual nexus, or in clearer metaphorical terms, much like the inner door unto the spiritual realms. The Form of Christ All the above seems to result in three main concrete substratum of the mind, namely logic, words, and mental forms. Thus, since, the Christian religion is a comprehensive reality, in the intrinsic bounds of the Scripture, one is able to become nourished in all of these three substratum of the mind, in Christ-centric manners, often resulting in numerous mental phenomena, which may infinitely organize with each other, supplicate each another, all in a purely Christ-centric manner. The result is, one is gifted, after faith and scripture reading, and internalizing the Word of God, the form of Christ, which thus becomes the epistemic foundational resource for all following scriptural based process (such as Church life, or out of the Church, in the cosmic Church life). The internalization of the Form of Christ, by the gift, grace, love, work, and sacrifice of God, gives the allowance of spiritual actualization, amongst other concrete and wondrously amazing mental and heart phenomena. What is Knowledge? Knowledge has concrete form. It is more or less, if true, all three of the above substratum (syntax, forms, and logic) accurately representing external reality. It is informational transmutation into the three forms, as one concrete structure. Forms may be abstracted from within the mind, in contemplation, or in meditation, or one may abstract new forms, from external reality, by internalizing external reality, whether in abstract manners directly into abstract thought and knowledge, or by comprehending reality as a whole, and internalizing the data, and then reflecting later on such phenomena. Thus, external reality, and all of it as a whole, can be translated into knowledge. The empiricist uses a theory to observation phenomenology, into risque syntactical structures and math, while the Christian uses a comprehension to syntax phenomenology, which is infinitely more efficient, clear, clean, and whole. Thus, knowledge, without creating a reductionist argument, must become a concrete concept, containing all three substrata of the mind, as a unique structure, set apart from the others as knowledge, but with innate syntactical, form, and logical properties. True knowledge is simply the cognal forms which accurately internalize information, in both form, and processed with perfect logic filters into a syntactically conducive concept or "meta-form," which is innately stored as a simple concept or network of. The Form of Christ in Relation with Knowledge The form of Christ, since it is alive, and because it is a purely spiritual, and perfect mental phenomena, which perfectly represents the true and living Christ, allows for teleological development, in all manners of Christ, bringing one into what God has spoken through the Apostles "into the Kingdom." Now all knowledge, if true, is able to integrated into the form of Christ, for knowledge, if true, accurately reconstructs reality, into cognal and syntactical forms, into a concept or a "meta-form." Thus sciences, if complying to the idea of true knowledge, may easily be integrated into the form of Christ. In fact, all knowledge, if complying with the idea of true knowledge, may easily be integrated in the form of Christ. The cosmos, in the Christian religion, and intensive and explicit behaviors becomes a sub-set area of the Imagos, which is the image of that which is. Heaven has its own image, or fundamental visual-concrete properties, which is also an explicit thing of the Imagos. The term physical is most closely associated with "empirical," or with the cosmos itself, in the most comprehensive and widest sciences and argumentation regarding such a term. However, heaven, is differentiated from the cosmos, in that, it has a different type of substance which substantively creates its image or structure, that is, its visio-concrete essence. The "imago Christini," or the image of Christ, is His form, with none of its properties subtracted from either the heavenly, or cosmic realms, thus allowing it to be a form of comprehensive interlocutor, and meta-integration point, in which all knowledge, image actualization, and syntax, may be centered around, and actualized, and compiled. This is somewhat how a Prophets mind works. They systematize all of their mental processes from Jesus Christ Himself, thus eventually after much information internalization, and Christ-centric non-reductionist cognition's, and the result, after a certain point, in which comprehensive actualization of the Imagos is completed, and the strong and hefty internalization's of the Logos, that is, the true Word by which all things have been structured as revealed in Christ, the result, is, access and re-creation of the "mind of God," at the human level. Of course, Chesterton, while having God-like intelligence, was only human, and thus while he could access the "mind of God," as described above, he could not internalize the whole thing in an omniscient manner, and send his attention divergently to different archimedean points on the Imagos, or morphemic structures in the Logos. He must access various subsidiary focal integration's at the divine level, and integrate there, and thus, the Prophet has divine subsidiary focal integration's. The Perfect Microcosm We are made in God's image, that is, His imagos, which He spoke into existence by His Logos, or His Word. Lofty, analyzations, would prod me to say, that His Imagos, was transmuted into human form, not only at the cosmos level, which alone, would render us a reductionistic microcosm, but, because we reflect both the heavenly nature, and cosmic nature, in microcosmic form, we are thus complete, and thus made truly microcosms, and perfect. Now, the fall provided us with disunion, from being perfect microcosm, and the implicit disunion from God, and the tamperings of humanity by the devil, creates holes in this image, and places where there is disunion, as there is disunion in those whose skin has been diseased by leprosy. Integration's of Knowledge with the Form of Christ The various substrata must become aligned with "truth," and with true knowledge, and then into the form of Christ. In that order, all valid knowledge, and valid phenomenologies, may be systematically organized to accommodate such ideas, and then, to be transmutated into the form of Christ, at the meta-scientific, meta-philosophical, and meta-theological level. This would allow for absolute discursive means of absorbing the thought of the non-Christian realm, into a meta-system of thought, which could easily becomes systematized into a computer program, in which one could access any part of this form. The form of Christ, is comprehensive, and extends to all things which are, as the Holy Spirit slowly is changing all things, to become the Kingdom of God. Christ is the King of All Things, not just certain aspects of the cosmos, and soon, all knees will bow. |
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |