Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction
After years of projects, which have been musical, intellectual, and media based, here is my first post since March 2016. This is a simple attempt to explain the absolute process which creates the modern American liberal, and perhaps the theology behind it as well. From protests of illegal nudists, to impeachment declarations based on minor investigations of actual crimes to Ukraine, to liberals generally screaming in a co-dependent unhealthiness in pretty much all sectors, trying to merge into a form of godless identity at a global level, which undermines, discredits, and destroys all in its path of domination. Now I do not believe in bi-partisan-ism, and I could just as easily give a "Phenomenology of the Conservative," with all the embarrassment that discrete and censured self-hypocrisies that is intrinsic to all humans and especially political groups and factions provides, and though I may, it is not near as important than investigating the collective evil which manifests as "agents of righteousness," and morality, yet traverse with an ecological parasitic moral foray which creates a life draining principle to all those ambivalent towards it, and a life destroying principle to all those whom consciously oppose it. Godlessness and the Mask No one, wants to be seen as evil, Sigmund Freud pointed out. Humans strive towards creating a dominating, openly lawless, animal, thus bestial environment, if they are saturated in sin and licentiousness. Therefore, if this was to be possible it would need to become a socially approved political movement that only exists as transient expressions of a false domain, which is neither Godly nor human necessarily... a Guerrilla and perhaps worse than gorilla expression of what Freud also labeled as the ID being expressed, and Slavoj Zizek calls the expression of what he describes as the "evil-ID," that rage, that fundamental indignant error saturated, and unprincipled vacuum of death which seeks to draw all unto its domain, the anti-Christ. It all starts with a tick, a rebellious urge to do something unnatural and stupid, negative and intentionally wrong impulse gratification. The reasons why it is considered unnatural and stupid are attempted to be discredited by the post-corrupted ideology of relativism, which claims itself an absolute truth, yet discredits all other possible arrangements of truth in principium. Only satan claims to be able to harness the infinite and attempt to utilize it, all-the-while saying it does not exist, and while still completely dependent on its power (the Trinity), claims it is the enemy, that the Word of God is not anything but ambiguous parables and mythological and cosmic hearsay. Thus the adversary creates this mask of morality, to deceive those who want positive attention, thus the pre-Narcissistic are candidates for the corruption process. The intentionally wrong impulse gratifiers. Demons will begin the process of creating a social matrice which is a temporal stinting of actual moral process, of others, though it is weak, weak minds succumb. When an individual goes into a situation with this false faith that they can get away with anything by potentially doing something wrong, the adversaries shame those around the tempted only in a temporary and economic enough manner in which enables the tempted to "see," only for a second perhaps, the possibility of being able to do whatever. This is how evil spirits bring people apart. A pneumatological burst of energy against a cognitive, and thus neural process which would existentially apply morals and boundaries autonomously, gets cheap shot, and now there is an existential pathway or condition in which the tempted sees the illusion of a proof, that he or she, can do whatever and get away with it, but is actually accruing the wrath of God, and the resentment and disgust, of the general community, as well as the grief of the Christians. Having nothing now to recur on, the only option is to be infinitely lawless afterwards, to gain negative identity experience, and create an identity, out of lawlessness and delusion, avoiding detection, intrigue, and pretending to be "good," to try and top it all off. If the individual realizes at any point what they are doing is not good, the whole process is seen as a deliberate sham, a proof for demonic affectivity, and a natural a priori attempt at repentance is attempted, and met with the animalistic rage of the devil, and the other corrupt. Now the synthetic repentance, and attempt at a final human-hood of safety from sin becomes the goal, and a mask is now torn, and the shame is processed. Politics and the Liberal Subconscious Abort babies, and save the animals. This ridiculous injustice is bound to cause a deep and justified wrath in the healthy heart and mind, which is the target, to get people to react. For when people simply react, it is with the un-mitigated ID-expression, and though the just when brought to this point are justified by actual necessity in love, the liberal unleashed lawlessness out of a raw modal desire spurred on by nothing more than a silent lie. The socialism Bernie Sanders desires, is ridiculous. Every single socialist state to completely give the rights of the economy to the state has failed. People centered socialism works, but that's not socialism. it's generosity, a virtue, those in power could not conditionally be capable of, except through meta-political expression, not the local expression, where it is actually needed, the here and now. Except people are too ashamed to ask their neighbor for things, because of unsurity, and the lack of trust. "Ask and you shall receive." So they must ask the government, which according to Carl Jung is seen as a quasi-animate personality, and in the liberal mind, the parent. A government structure, which is an abstract organization of principles, is not a parent. People are capable of care, but not anything else, that's in consensual abstract domain at the intra and hopefully inter-social level (if the government is legitimate and good, under God). So destroying the nation out of a subconscious rage, through principles which only seem moral to the uneducated, the indifferent, the other co-dependents who want to control everything out of an immature and un-repressed rage, who will scream for social justice one second, and then say "eat babies, save the world," the next. The liberal mind is the most unimpressive act of hostility against God since Judas, that existential and fundamentally idiotic bait and switch for power, money, and attention, is a core theme of the corrupt, not necessarily liberal, though its essence is engraved in the actual written policies of the liberal, and they strive for an environment, where they "feel" like they don't have to hide it. The Manufacturing of the Problem Most liberals are not here for anything but the destruction of society, and hidden behind webs of complexes, and simple ID-rage, there is lonely human, seeking retaliation for nothing. Oh, how free they would feel to realize this fallacious doctrine fed to them, was killing them, in the most slow and sadistic of manners, like a frog in a pan, whose nerves could not pick up on the absolute condition of its death, and pretended it was taking a bath with the other frogs. Heck, the frog government they even screamed at enough to where the free bath was finally given to them. Well, the frogs in this analogy got the justice they insinuated to be fighting for, but perhaps only subconsciously really wanted. Suicide. I think liberalism is fueled by this confused self-hatred, which is negatively projected upon everything, for self-hatred is evil, and Freud's observation that need a positive self-image to maintain psychic and physical balance for survival, to keep moving forward drains the liberal of all productive and actually just capacity, as their evils as they exist, are in their minds, twisted and projected through a general series of complexes which are simply, psychic principles internalized to direct emotions where, and the self-hatred is thus projected onto everything, and since good people are generally knowledgeable, experienced, and open to new things through love, they represent the greatest threat. This is why the liberals demon-listening and obeying usually leads exactly to the behavioral and empirical expression, to that of a snake. The eerie calm and information gathering conditional-mode, or the lashing out, and systemic exploitation of the good person. The avoidant-dehumanizing or sexually-aggressive and physically oppressive and attempted dominance. The good person always knows what's coming, it's a matter of timing and God's expression of His Will to know what to do and when to do it to avoid, counter, shame wholesomely, and bring to light these processes. Not easy, but certainly fun. Introduction Introduction Introduction
It seems all too well, that it may be more simple than we have expected, that is, the explanation of dreams. As a Christian oneirology (the study of dreams), this phenomenology must take the claims of science, against the claims of Christianity, and thus assert itself, to make out the science to be a reduction, and explain why science can read such phenomena, in a reductionistic language, and also how to interpret the dreams. This blog post, to keep a steady distance away from occult phenomena, or non-Christian spiritual tainting, must thus conform itself, to the infinitude of the imago of Christ, out of a genuine heart of faith, or it will thus fail in its mission to deliver such a phenomena. This is What Dreams Are Made Of, Literally As conforming of the rules of the knowledge theory, in which I have theologically curated from scratch, and philosophically delineated the boundaries of in "The Hairston Knowledge Theory," I asserted that three main faculties create the mind from the "ground up," namely, syntax, forms, and logic. The three interact with each others, teleologically conducive to the being in question, more or less, based on their epistemic foundation, which, if Christian by faith, is Christ Himself, allowing the language of that being to be God's language, and the resulting processes and teleological developments, to take place from the ground up, in His form of Holiness. Thus, dreams, could be said, to be the hyper-integration of these logic and forms, based on the Godly Logos, allowing for the sentential logic, and archetypal forms to integrate in a fashion, technically in a manner, which is conforming to the image of Christ, but also precluding the actualization, and carrying out of God's Will. Thus, the individual who dreams a dream, in the light of Christ, will have "Christian dreams,"which may be consciously described by a Christian interpreter, who knows how to decode the explicit dream structure, in a language which is culturally conducive, to the individuals whom are listening to that individual. The descriptor in question, must have the Logos internalized, and know how to read it in the mind of others, and articulate the resulting forms and logic's, or the bonded results (normative mental noumena, as opposed to self-justifying and borderline Kantian occult phenomena), in a manner, which is linguistically capable of comprehension by those whom are listening to the individual interpret or describe such dreams. Now the non-theological, is dangerous, in that, the human logos is often deceptive, and creates disorganization and disunion very quickly, and is highly susceptible to demons altering such things arbitrarily, to create disunion in alignment with Satan's will, opposing Jehovah's. Thus, an individual, if interpreting dreams of others, whose minds are not epistemically rooted in Christ, must take extreme caution that they themselves are rooted in Christ by faith, and in the Godly Logos, lest they fall to misinterpretation, and run the risk of internalizing the subtle prose of satan and demons, which often affects the human logos. However, the individual, whom is firmly rooted in Christ, and interprets another individuals dreams, whom epistemic foundation is not the Godly Logos, but the sheepish and apostate human alternative (the often extremely prideful, human logos), will be able to interpret the dreams with pure accuracy. Dreams are capable of predicting the future, in normative mental noumenonic manners, or they can integrate aspects of the personality, and really can be a comprehensive formula, for integrating ones life (milk aids in good dreaming, and good dreaming, leads to an integrated, and well organized life). The Seeds Pre-Figure the Tree The epistemic foundation, or what the being in questions mind is rooted upon, will not only determine their entire life structure, and the structures of other individuals life, as goes along with being "social creatures," it also determines the general pattern or structure of the dreams, or the literal noumenonic language. If the being identifies itself, with something, most concurrently, then one may be able to say, that that is most likely its epistemological foundation, namely its identity (whether true or false is irrelevant here). Thus it could be said that the seeds which are the epistemic foundation, prefigures the trees, or, more or less, the entire structure of the mind and the concurrent general patterns and structures of the dreams. I, as being a self-righteous gentile predicates, assert that one must always be rooted in Christ. Thus, the wondrous and glory-ridden seed that is Christ, if the seed of the mind, may become a tree of the like in which few pagans of the Greek poet times of Homer, would absolutely fail to conceive of. They simply do not have the language of the Word. Science's Petty View of Dreams Science, in a nutshell, offers us a view of dreams, that is filtered through a social consensus, after it has undergone various and ambiguous scientific method processes, and came out with a possibly invalid result, on which everyone may agree or disagree upon. It is a blind mans chess game. There are many theories of dreams, one of which, the great psychological skeptic, Sigmund Freud asserted, "the sexual aspect of the being, is God," while basing his dream psychology on such, left barren the mind, devoid of anything good, but what is left, is the fable of Sigmund Freud, and not a very Holy one at that! The current consensus of cognitive psychology, would state, that it is mere integration (while denying any meta-physical constraints, which is creating a multi-fallacious argument, reductio ad absurdum, ad ignorantium, metaphysical fallacies, etc) of information of the mind,processing short-term memory data, into functional long-term memory, and furthermore, into instinctual behavioral schematics, which can be accessed at any time, and acted upon. I, personally, being meta-theologically and meta-philosophically a posteriori, would challenge this assertion, to be roughly 5 percent of the entirety of the function of dreams, as often than nought, science forgets about the Imagos, or even the cosmos, and reduces itself to a sheepish and unstable abstract nominalism, which is then only validated by "peers." That is unwise, in the eyes of a philosopher, and creates many pockets of ambiguity, and places where there is no truth, but a skeptical and vague possibility of it. The theological manner of tackling this issue, is far easier, as spiritual men comprehend phenomena as a whole, and convert their comprehension, directly into warranted syntax, which they may articulate or write down in little mole skin journals. The Joy of Good Science Often, while deriding science, one forgets, to give science its due credit. While I admit that science is paranoid field of thought, and creates cognitive deterioration in infinite regression, as well as disorganization at all levels of being, if idolized, it does however, have the ability to mete out nominal truth. This is not truth as a whole, but rather, as nominalism goes, one abstract archemedian point of truth. It is taking a circle, full of mysterious and wondrous colors, but only looking at the points in which one self-righteously and self-justifyingly would like to pen out for themselves, and denying the rest of the circle. All nominalism, is extremely selfish, and opposed to God in every way, and always will lead to self-aggrandizement. However, as social creatures, there is a consensus to uphold, to help warrant and validate such things. So, these archemedian points, must go through the rigorous social process of becoming warranted, in which many individuals, agree that these archemedian points, are being described correctly, as what they are, in the mode of thought, social process, and speech of science. The result, thereof, is in fact, nominal truth (hopefully, if science was being responsible, which it often is not). When translated into oneirology, this allows for a form of interpretation of dreams, in a strict adherence to this nominalised language of science, and in the intrinsic bounds of such, is able to describe certain concrete functions, but as I said earlier, only roughly 5%. That is how science is able to create redutionistic language of interpreting dreams, though would deny the Godly Logos, rendering it extremely susceptible to a form of intellectual nothingness, rising in the form of existential nihilism. This is a similar social process (it started with Nietzsche at the human level, but the dragon, or being of the heavily satanic sort with theological a posterior knowledge) which has created the modern void. That infinite nihilism, which self-aggrandizes, and sucks all God out of any possible scientific equation. Dreaming The Dream of Reading the Dream Earlier I gave a brief description of what needs to be present philosophically and theologically to interpret dreams truthfully (the Godly Logos must be internalized, and one must be able to read the minds of others, or hear a description of another individuals dreams - both are possible, though one requires a deep spiritual empathy, and the other a loving and listening ear), but this is a simple task for the follower of Christ, and thus I will leave it up to them to take responsibility for such, and to learn how to let the Godly Logos and the Spirit internalize the logos of others, in a manner which allows them to comprehend the dreams of others, and articulate the structures back to them and their comprehensive meaning, in a language conducive to the surrounding individuals whom are listening to the interpretation. Introduction The limits all physics is constrained to, in all concrete reality, is a cognitive to cosmos asymptotic appropriation, in a 'hopefully' concrete manner, in regards to the cosmos itself, and the description of the cosmos and its subset objects, in the language of math and a grammatically conducive language to the individual whom is physicizing, to explain the implicit math of the thought, into common language . This means that the bounds of the ability of physics to describe anything, is the cosmos itself. This is extremely disappointing, as I would want a math that could describe anything. The wildly accepted thesis of the big bang has become the most widely accepted doctrine in any culture, apart from the trinity in the orthodox culture of Christians. This is an admonished, and unfortunate event, though none apart from the militant intellectuals of the world know why. The idea of the big bang, seems to me, to be a mathematically derived idea, of a self-justifying nominalism that is reminiscent of the behavior of a Godless and self-justifying individual, than it is of good mathematics. The truth is, the idea of the big bang, could easily be refuted with the idea of the big bag, which I will explain below. The Big Bag I think that I could get away with saying, that the mind is much like a big bag. It collects things. Apart from simply collecting things, it breaks things down, and synthesizes them, and puts those things into words. The mind is capable of abstracting anything, and putting those abstractions into a form of syntax, that is, a written language using symbols to express a mutually identifiable cognitive form, abstraction, logic, syntax, or the collection of. It takes actual objects, and phenomena, and recreates it in "archetypal form," that is, a mental picture or pattern of the real object or phenomena (or collection thereof). Then the forms are usually either stored as they are, appreciated, depreciated, loved, hated, or aesthetizied towards the point of idolatry, or even scorned and emptied of any subjective value that an individual may place on such a theoretical object or phenomena. Usually, in the mind of the intellectual, further discourse is needed, and further intellection needs to be taken place, or else they may feel empty or dry, and maybe even guilty, so these forms get shifted over into the other part of the mind,responsible for breaking things down by the laws of either Socratic logic, or mathematical and modal logic, and these forms get organized accordingly. If that wasn't enough, the real creative folk of the realm of the modern intellectuals, seem to also go a step further,and translate these organized states of the cognitive realm, into a form of syntax in poetic manners, resulting in Chesterton esque writers, who can fathom the deepest realms of reality, and with a God-like ease (due to the gift of Prophecy allowing access to the Mind of God), to re-organize these thoughts, forms, logics, in poetic manners, into syntactical structures, with creative and unique grammars, such as the Lewisian prose, or the Tolkienien environment description and character banter in 12th century modes of prose, weaving in and out of meta-thoughts and imagination. Most Prophetic minds, like Bonhoeffer, or Ellen White, and maybe even George MacDonald, are capable of actualizing the entire Imagos, in which the cosmos is the bottom half, and heaven the upper, and the Logos, the true universal syntax, or the Word of God. In reading higher education papers written by Stephen Hawking, his collaborators, and discursively learning about such things over the years, it can be easily concluded that his mind is sterile, and extremely limited in areas of actualization of the Imagos, to the lower half alone, sterilizing his mind from seeing or perceiving the spiritual or heavenly realms, conceding to the fact that his mind is ontologically deficient, however, has extreme sentential logic to syntax capabilities. This allows him to compute what forms he internalizes into extremely abstract and discrete mathematical language, but is limited to the forms of the cosmos, and thus is spiritually blind. Jesus, while having a perfect mind, had a mind to love, and to embody the Will of God, but knew that describing the cosmos, or even the heavens as a comprehensive whole and theory would be useless, without work, and without the Word of God. This is because Jesus could comprehend the whole of reality, and He thus knew laws that Stephen Hawking, in the most intuitively complex reaches of his integration's and imagination, did not know, needed fulfilling and accounting for even though Stephen Hawking was intellectually a priori in regards to such things. Jesus embodied the law of all things, including things mathematical, and laws extended to not merely the cosmos, but to heaven, and took responsibility for all of them. His perfect ontological interlocutor, which helped mediate His mind in relation to reality as a whole, is something, which is imputed to Christians, by faith, and with the work of the Holy Spirit. The Big Bag that is the human mind is capable of internalizing anything, including itself, which makes credence to the fact of faith, that we were in fact made in the image of God, as we reflect the infinitude in which God is, in image form. Image The idea of the image, in the Christian sense, will forever stump physicists with a heavenly stumbling block until the end of time. All cosmos is image, and all heaven is image. We were created in this image, and more specifically, the image of God, was the image of man, before the fall. Man had this fundamental unity with God, as being image sharers, though the fall reduced us to becoming only image bearers, until the Christ came. God, through Christ, allowed us human individuals, a fundamental Imago-genic option, by faith in Jesus, to re-conform to this image, that is God the Father. Humans do the opposite of what God does. Us humans will offer up our own words, which are often barren, formless, and deceitful to the heavens, and almost always in-substantive, while God offers us His Word, in a seemingly (a priori faith,which create spiritual and cosmic blindness often) in-substantive operation, which is made concretely substantive by faith. "The Word became flesh." This means the substantive became human. "The Word was God." This substantive love incarnate, that was also God, that is Jesus Christ, the historical one. The faith roots the heart in this substantive being, whom was Jesus, and thus God's Word is presented for us to internalize by this faith, in that man-God who was Christ. This is the opposite of the human method, as humans will generate grammar relative to this non-God, whom is every man and woman who is not Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the Historical one. Like a computer, which is causated by syntax, into image, this Imagos, was likewise causated. Computers are a primordial sub-microcosm, in a silicone structure. The computers have image, which are called into existence by this syntax, that is computer code. This idea of a pure Imago-genic telic recursion is easy, but self-justification is the devil that will oppose God, and because of this, it becomes a non sequitur in the mind of the self-justifier, that we were not created, even though the creation of the computer is literally a perfect, and teleologically derived form of the human being in silicone form, in its concrete existence in the Imagos. Is it such a stretch of the imagination to imagine such a notion, or such a shrinking of the common ego, to believe in such a thing? A Serious Refutation of the Big Bang Idea All entropy would disagree with the idea of the big bang, but self-justifying and ambiguous logic might confuse the situation. Now it seems like God is simply calling more image from the void, by His Word, than the info-cognitively derived forms of the idea cosmological expansion would like to say. But, because, there is not yet an individual who has internalized the forms of, and transmutated such forms into Socratic or mathematical logic, into a logically conducive syntax which is readily expressed into a higher education culture which could, in a warranted manner, validate the syntax of, it would either be an ad ignoranmium to say that the idea of God calling more form unto creation, or it is an act of comprehending concrete phenomena, which never changes (though our beliefs and forms, and syntax, and logic do) into a culturally conducive language (such as English). The Christian has this upper hand, because they use a direct comprehension to syntax phenomenology to speak and to act, in direct relation to their God, whom is Christ, in which they comprehend His Words and Imagos, and articulate the most necessary syntax as prescribes accordingly to the Truine God's imputationed means of integration (which is perfect) called the subsidiary focal integration, which is a perfect mode of thought, constantly integrating the authoritative, existential, and situational cognition's, with each other, to create the subsidiary focal integration, which allows teleological action to take place, and ontological phenomena to be concretely rendered, by the nature of the Triune integration itself. This, unfortunately, for the scientists, and to the horror of the a priori Christianity scientific community, is in fact a means of perfect thought, in which perfect intelligence is possible, and Plato rolling over in his grave in happiness, towards Jesus, for gifting humanity this perfect means of thought. Conclusion All this said, I would rather trust in the thesis of the faithfully caused mind which is the "big bag," than the thesis of the big bang. For the big bag, which has been re-created by God, in the individual Christians mind, is far more potent, and truth oriented, than any sterile mind could wish to articulate or comprehend, or internalize. That is the result of grace though, and not because of philosophy. Not even this essay can add or subtract value from this big bag, but rather aid in extremely, and almost unjust clarification of such, for the mind that is eternal, and comprehends all as a result of faith by grace, is worthy of only praising the instigator of such a mind, whom is that Triune God. Introduction It is quite simple. It requires a form of post-modern mathematical meta-reasoning, in which one systematically integrates such mathematical prose of abstract and symbolic logic and implicit objects, directly into the mental form of Christ, which is, (after I have given a brief phenomenology of how this form exists and what it exactly is and represents) a form which extends to and perfectly represents Christ Himself mentally (to the point in which it IS Christ), that is, the Word. Thus, when such is given, I shall dialectically enumerate on a possible framework for how all knowledge may be integrated into such a form, and for that matter, what knowledge exactly is. How the Mind Works It (the mind) utilizes two main differentiated faculties at the most basic level of apprehension, but requires another for the more complex faculties. The three are, respectively, sentential logic, archetypal forms, and syntax operations. The sentential logic, is a basic mode of biological math, which allows a teleological upwardness, best expressed in neurology, as the functions responsible for creating functional growth and development of the psyche and cognition. The mind internalizes data from the outside world and reality, and organizes it according the hearts appropriative schemata, which could be anything, be it goals, desires (whether carnal, deceitful, brash, or holy, righteous, and truthful), and other such forms of the heart. The heart is much like the BIOS of the cognitive systems, but also provides a form of ontological (metaphysical) connexion unto the spiritual realm, and it is therefore much like a spiritual nexus, or in clearer metaphorical terms, much like the inner door unto the spiritual realms. The Form of Christ All the above seems to result in three main concrete substratum of the mind, namely logic, words, and mental forms. Thus, since, the Christian religion is a comprehensive reality, in the intrinsic bounds of the Scripture, one is able to become nourished in all of these three substratum of the mind, in Christ-centric manners, often resulting in numerous mental phenomena, which may infinitely organize with each other, supplicate each another, all in a purely Christ-centric manner. The result is, one is gifted, after faith and scripture reading, and internalizing the Word of God, the form of Christ, which thus becomes the epistemic foundational resource for all following scriptural based process (such as Church life, or out of the Church, in the cosmic Church life). The internalization of the Form of Christ, by the gift, grace, love, work, and sacrifice of God, gives the allowance of spiritual actualization, amongst other concrete and wondrously amazing mental and heart phenomena. What is Knowledge? Knowledge has concrete form. It is more or less, if true, all three of the above substratum (syntax, forms, and logic) accurately representing external reality. It is informational transmutation into the three forms, as one concrete structure. Forms may be abstracted from within the mind, in contemplation, or in meditation, or one may abstract new forms, from external reality, by internalizing external reality, whether in abstract manners directly into abstract thought and knowledge, or by comprehending reality as a whole, and internalizing the data, and then reflecting later on such phenomena. Thus, external reality, and all of it as a whole, can be translated into knowledge. The empiricist uses a theory to observation phenomenology, into risque syntactical structures and math, while the Christian uses a comprehension to syntax phenomenology, which is infinitely more efficient, clear, clean, and whole. Thus, knowledge, without creating a reductionist argument, must become a concrete concept, containing all three substrata of the mind, as a unique structure, set apart from the others as knowledge, but with innate syntactical, form, and logical properties. True knowledge is simply the cognal forms which accurately internalize information, in both form, and processed with perfect logic filters into a syntactically conducive concept or "meta-form," which is innately stored as a simple concept or network of. The Form of Christ in Relation with Knowledge The form of Christ, since it is alive, and because it is a purely spiritual, and perfect mental phenomena, which perfectly represents the true and living Christ, allows for teleological development, in all manners of Christ, bringing one into what God has spoken through the Apostles "into the Kingdom." Now all knowledge, if true, is able to integrated into the form of Christ, for knowledge, if true, accurately reconstructs reality, into cognal and syntactical forms, into a concept or a "meta-form." Thus sciences, if complying to the idea of true knowledge, may easily be integrated into the form of Christ. In fact, all knowledge, if complying with the idea of true knowledge, may easily be integrated in the form of Christ. The cosmos, in the Christian religion, and intensive and explicit behaviors becomes a sub-set area of the Imagos, which is the image of that which is. Heaven has its own image, or fundamental visual-concrete properties, which is also an explicit thing of the Imagos. The term physical is most closely associated with "empirical," or with the cosmos itself, in the most comprehensive and widest sciences and argumentation regarding such a term. However, heaven, is differentiated from the cosmos, in that, it has a different type of substance which substantively creates its image or structure, that is, its visio-concrete essence. The "imago Christini," or the image of Christ, is His form, with none of its properties subtracted from either the heavenly, or cosmic realms, thus allowing it to be a form of comprehensive interlocutor, and meta-integration point, in which all knowledge, image actualization, and syntax, may be centered around, and actualized, and compiled. This is somewhat how a Prophets mind works. They systematize all of their mental processes from Jesus Christ Himself, thus eventually after much information internalization, and Christ-centric non-reductionist cognition's, and the result, after a certain point, in which comprehensive actualization of the Imagos is completed, and the strong and hefty internalization's of the Logos, that is, the true Word by which all things have been structured as revealed in Christ, the result, is, access and re-creation of the "mind of God," at the human level. Of course, Chesterton, while having God-like intelligence, was only human, and thus while he could access the "mind of God," as described above, he could not internalize the whole thing in an omniscient manner, and send his attention divergently to different archimedean points on the Imagos, or morphemic structures in the Logos. He must access various subsidiary focal integration's at the divine level, and integrate there, and thus, the Prophet has divine subsidiary focal integration's. The Perfect Microcosm We are made in God's image, that is, His imagos, which He spoke into existence by His Logos, or His Word. Lofty, analyzations, would prod me to say, that His Imagos, was transmuted into human form, not only at the cosmos level, which alone, would render us a reductionistic microcosm, but, because we reflect both the heavenly nature, and cosmic nature, in microcosmic form, we are thus complete, and thus made truly microcosms, and perfect. Now, the fall provided us with disunion, from being perfect microcosm, and the implicit disunion from God, and the tamperings of humanity by the devil, creates holes in this image, and places where there is disunion, as there is disunion in those whose skin has been diseased by leprosy. Integration's of Knowledge with the Form of Christ The various substrata must become aligned with "truth," and with true knowledge, and then into the form of Christ. In that order, all valid knowledge, and valid phenomenologies, may be systematically organized to accommodate such ideas, and then, to be transmutated into the form of Christ, at the meta-scientific, meta-philosophical, and meta-theological level. This would allow for absolute discursive means of absorbing the thought of the non-Christian realm, into a meta-system of thought, which could easily becomes systematized into a computer program, in which one could access any part of this form. The form of Christ, is comprehensive, and extends to all things which are, as the Holy Spirit slowly is changing all things, to become the Kingdom of God. Christ is the King of All Things, not just certain aspects of the cosmos, and soon, all knees will bow. |
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |