Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction
As adheres to my other posts on bi-cognominalism, this one shall offer the kinetic outwardness of the essence of such, because it is so concrete, and stable a form of phenomenology, and provokes one unto the Will of Jehovah, instead of arbitrariness and false individuality. I shall dialectically enumerate on the two divisive domains of fiction and non-fiction reading in its relation with bi-cognominalism. Since, those two genus' of books are absolutely different in their substance, I feel there is a rudimentary a priori and a posteriori synthetic relationship between the two, which may need elaboration as well, because fictions borrows 80 percent of its structure from concrete reality, and non-fiction, ab initio. The Foundation of all Reading: Syntax and Image All syntax is image, but not all image is syntax. Syntax is the articulated form of image. Our minds, are made more so in the image of God, and thus we reflect His properties, wayyyyyy more than the other animals on this planet do. All reading is an act of actively transmuting this "syntactical image," into the other cognitive domains responsible, for say, imagination, consciousness, knowledge, learning, behavior, to the point where most intuitively have already comprehend these statements, but do not have the ability to clearly articulate such realities, in clear normative prose, or have not yet learned to become responsible, as a lifestyle, or are not yet inside the Will of God. The Reality of Syntax and Image All reality is image, but not all image is reality. I know this gets confusing, but it adheres to the order of everything, as made clear in Aristotle's genus-species logic (but what about modal logic, says all the philosophy majors, or Turing modalities, the math majors), even though Aristotle's genus-species logic is more archaic than most fossils which we dig up, in out modern times are. This "reality," is a bit more than simple image, even if the cosmos and heavens, without being reduced into a reductio ad absurdum of an argument, could be said to be a form of holographic trans-dimensional image, with a visio-concrete essence, which absolutely exists outside of the mind. Of course, holographic in the sense, in which it has Minkowski-dimensionality, and Lorentzian annulments. However, these mathematical inferences are less adequate than trying to spell out a form of language which has never been heard of in a certain part of the world before, and then belligerently trying to get ones needs met in such a language. At the individual level, our minds, as being made in the image of God, interact with the cosmos and heavens, in a bit more direct, personal, infinitely a fortiori and transcendent manner, compared to, say, animals, disagreeing with Alasdair MacIntyre's thesis on humans even truly being, in realistic rationality, "animals," but have a more sui generis genus as a species, even though most moderns, and I sometimes, behave like pleasure oriented animals, or beasts (as in thirios, from Revelations - more on this later in my blog) A Priori Internalization of Syntax Coming out of the womb, humans have an epigenetically rendered ability to read, and thus anything they read, until their knowledge, in which the basic forms are image, syntax, and the relation therein, considered logic, vehemently, by most metaphysicians and servants of the domain of math, and thus, one is able to internalize syntax, before coming to a finite knowledge of what the syntax structure, represents internally, externally, or in the place in between, the formative domain, where forms exist from within and from without. This is an important stage, to internalize as many syntax structures as one can, even if one cannot finitely come to the knowledge of the truth yet. This stage usually takes place in toddlers, and ends at the age of 5, however, in modernity, there are those who have regressed into the void, wiping out all knowledge of the truth, which is just syntax, finitely integrated with external or internal forms, which such a syntax represents, and thus, adults are perpetually sucked into this state, if stuck in the pleasure - oriented Machiavellian state of godlessness, in which so syntactical recursion can take place on their abstracted or internalized forms. Syntax and Posteriori Grammatical Inference and Temporal Organization Those whom work their way out of the void (which can take years of extremely confusing and delicate psychic process re-mapping, and Christ-sourced spiritual strengthening) usually come to the ability to develop the ability to become syntax affluent to the manner in which they grammatically inference at the substance of the syntactical image in which they are appraising, internalizing, comprehending, or apprehending, in which they inference the grammatical rules, and networks thereof in which they have learned, and quickly, using their noetic faculties, assertively judge which ones are most responsible and appropriate for the syntax image or images at hand, in order to temporally organize them, to create their (hopefully) overall proper meaning, in clear contextual form, conducing either the most important information for the individual reading at hand, or trying to empathize with the authors genuine thoughts, forms, and processes, and accurately constructing a form of reader-to-author empathy, getting the most substance out of that which is being read. This is being temporally (in the sterile mind) organized in the peripheral cognitions and faculties such as imagination, allowing the benefit of mentally constructing what is being syntactically articulated, in the internal world and mind, in its full mathematical parameters, of course, that is to say, only if the mind is trained, responsible, and well-developed. Archetypal Form This is absolutely an essential topic for reading, as archetypal forms play the largest role in reading, apart from the syntax itself, whereas sentential logic, merely points the syntax, with its respective and accurate "archetypal form." External reality, may be interpreted through the crux of a form, or the form may exist purely from within, as a classical archetypal form. These may be broken down, and certain domains of these forms may be related with each other, by sentential logic to create complex object relations, and abstract syntax and prose. Sentential Logic Sentential logic, merely allows for external and internal domains to be concretely rendered as finite things, and higher processes and more well developed sentential logic processes, differentiate, create heavy abstract object relations, and perform many tasks related with syntax and imagery, and the organization therein. That being said, us humans can master such a faculty, and not become autonomous and mindless sentential logicians, but may readily and consciously re-adapt such configurations, to say, create mental boundaries against weird thoughts, or pre-engineer tacitly a tangentially specific existential tract (this is usually a sterile and dangerous activity, as when its programed, usually one forgets to include, the ability to concretely render ones situation with each passing moment, or responsible obedience to all forms of authority, whether simple, normal, complex, or divine. Non-Fiction and Knowledge Ontico-Ontic Re-Creation of Real and Living Substance Non-fiction is far more easy to read, for the mind, which has not experienced too much of external reality and become a posteriori reality, and thus is more practical for the inexperienced or the sheltered. The ability to ontico-ontically re-create external reality and visio-concrete substance, as a finite internal construct, is a necessary human activity, without which, organizing objects to create complex technology, would be absolutely preposterous. The knowledge therein is absolutely essential, and without which, life will be a frustrating series of events, leaving you feeling powerless, and infinitely regressing into a godless, hypocritical, and ever degrading into godless state, and void. God wants us to learn about everything, for God is a God of knowledge. 1 Samuel 2:3, and one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is knowledge. That's in Ephesians. The syntax of non-fiction, usually is a lot more referential to things in which one has already experienced, and thus the reading of non-fiction is a lot easier on the mind and the psyche. Such a process is called "imagination," and in this case spurred by human experience and reading non-fiction books. Imagination and Active Reading Imagination, is essentially, the ontico-onto re-construction of some formative, formal, or substantive reality, whether external or internal of the individual, so that one has this realistic formative or internal projection of the real forms, abstracted, and put on such an almost cognitive holographic screen (if the formative means of imagination). Imagination, used in formal settings, is usually sub-conscious, and very abstract, to accommodate a goal, or enriching the present sociology with righteous, good, and bold sociological substance or fruit. The art of reading fruitfully is completely dependent on ones ability to actively imagine, while reading very actively, and very a posteriori-ly, aggressively, and at times hostile, and assertively at other times, as to get mental needs met, and very much aggressively moving forward mentally, a fortiori. A Priori Language of Fiction, as an A Priori Individual This is an impossible task, and if tried, will wear the brain down into a flagellum, or cognitive mess, at the least! However, one may a priori, without knowledge gained through experience, a priori, learn the syntax of reading, fiction, and then later attach such internalized syntax to their true counterparts, later on, to create a real a posterior integration into true knowledge, from an almost faithful, a priori, reading, into faithfully waiting for an experience where one can integrate such fruitfully, can crop up. Fiction and Posterior Knowledge of Ontico-Ontic Knowledge If the fiction in question contains narratives, and patterns, objects, personas, and divine phenomena, one has experienced, it is a lot easier to integrate such posteriori knowledge, in which the syntax and forms come pre-integrated while reading, so that one may read the fiction and accurately and acutely render the ontico-ontic knowledge on the spot, and actually enjoy the form of the fiction at hand. Meta-Appraisal and Meta-Contextualization This is where anthologies are rendered on the spot, as with ones entire tacit knowledge base, in which all external syntactical domains are appraised, as well as all internal, formal, and formative domains, as a formal sifting operation, in which the spiritual man is always doing 1 Corinthians 2:16, in which all patterns are meta-contextualized into meta-knowledge, allowing for a form of lifestyle in which knowledge is actualized at the meta-level as a meta-modern is absolutely possible. Introduction
In this post, I shall describe the relationship between the will, action, knowledge, and virtue, and how essentially, all must be derived, in a very synthetic and delicate process, from the action of the will itself, which is to say, an extremely delicate movement of the will, eo ipso, unto, action, and then unto knowledge, and then the potential candidate for the marrying of the two, which is, concretely, virtue. This shall be a short dialectic which partakes upon itself, the responsibility, for syntactically delineating such things, as concrete realities, in which we must will unto virtue on a daily basis. The Will The will is the most basic cognitive process, apart from automatic generalia of the nervous system. It could be defined as, in philosophy, as the direction of the heart unto a certain direction. This direction, is quite unlimited, and can span from the infinite directional-ism, of the internal realm, the formative realms, or into the external realms, the trans-finite realms, the syntactical realms, and really, all things, which have image, and all things have image thankfully,and action, has one of the most important images, besides, say, knowledge, and the extension of the two concretely rendered, as a form of virtue, usually. The Will unto Action When the will wills itself unto action, it does not simply will itself, but the being, who is in concrete possession of the will concretely willing itself unto action, as a whole concrete being of will, with will. Th will unto action, brings the whole being into subjection of the will, in which behaviors may be automated for a certain purpose, teleology, or end goal, existential tract, situational coverage, or level of obedience, towards a specific authority. Action, always leads unto knowledge, and thus, epistemology speaking, knowledge, is always the fruit of a good and faithful will. Ergo, Soren Kierkegaard book "Purity of Heart is the Will to One Thing," which ironically is the one book of his, I never got the chance to read full, even though I got to read the thesis outline. Willing to one thing, is having a pure heart, because, when one wills to one thing, as Soren Kierkegaard put it, their heart must do it consistently and faithfully, and only be willing that one thing, thus all evil behaviors, become impossible to corrupt ones heart, because it is busy willing itself to one thing, and that one thing alone, and nothing else. Thus because of such a strong and pure, and bold action, the most simple action of all actions, the heart is rendered pure, and full of the light of the individuals good, for a second. Of course, without Jesus, this light goes out very quickly. The Will to Action of One Brings Knowledge Knowledge usually comes through experience, whether reading, or experiencing the outside world, and both absolutely require action, sparked by the will itself, willing oneself, unto action. A will, always purifies itself, after time in action, or experiencing eternity in action, and thus a form of virtue is usually abstracted as a means to easily allow the will to appropriate itself unto, for a quick and easy reference, almost like a cheat menu. This allows for easy and good things in which the will may will itself unto action of, and for, or by. This often calls for the need of the man who is thirsting for His Righteousness, to come to the knowledge of virtue, in of itself. The Knowledge of Virtue, Before the Action of Virtue Once one has come to the knowledge of a specific virtue, gained form experience it becomes easy to "act" of said virtue in question, such as honesty. If one has played Skyrim, then they know that once a certain virtue point i gained, and adopted, it is their for good, unless one has a means to re-shaped them, such as at a skill reset vendor or something to that effect (fans don't kill me, it has been a while since I have played that game). It's like it Polanyi's philosophy, when a certain value is tacitly adopted, it is existentially adopted, and integrated into ones tacit knowledgebase, and performed as a tacit functor, sociologically often. once one has known a virtue, then one may always act of it. The Action of Virtue The ability to act of virtue, arbitrarily is a prime gift from God, without which, very little society would be left, as virtues helped regulate our society in creative manners, create existential self-esteem, existential support systems, and girding, it builds barriers to sin in the workplace, and destroys the kingdom of sin and satan very fast, which is why satan undermines those of creative and great virtue so often, and so much, such as Prophets, who get persecuted, mocked, humiliated, scorned, an often times, killed. The Will of Virtue Virtue tends to take on itself, after the will has willed oneself unto virtue, as a part of the will itself, so that all the virtues are implicitly or explicitly, absorbed into the will itself, so that they are concretely rendered a part of the will itself, and concretely are the will itself, and thus the being. This allows for virtue, to become will, and yet retain its identity in the being, as the will, and explicitly or implicitly, as the being in question, itself. Virtue becomes being, as pure virtue. Pure Virtue Pure virtue is when the virtue is so well consolidated to a perfect and finite degree in the will of the being in question, that it has metamorphosed unto being the being in question. "I am good." "I am excellent." You are great." Those are all phrases which exhibit the virtue of the self, and of others, as concrete beings with pure virtue, where virtue is the being. One does not say "Oh, that particular individual has such an excellent bout of honesty, on this fine morning, unless we are long hand and formally declaring the virtue, in respect to the individual in question, and thus that mode of speech, is the long-hand mode of speaking about virtue, while differentiating the being, the virtue, and the will, as altogether different things, in conversation, which gets to differentiated and abstract for the average individual and mind, to formally respond, in a responsible and appropriate manner. Pure virtue, if mastered, may only lead to pure will, if it wills itself unto the being, being willing, to will itself, unto pure will. Another metamorphosis of the hearts will, and O, how far we have come faithfully up to this moment, for those whom have experienced such things! What fruit in heaven there shall be! What glory and splendor! Pure Will Pure will, is not purity of will, nor is it the shame of feeling the guilt of possibly falling to "anfechtung," or temptation, an thus corrupting ones purity of heart, but rather the freedom of the heart altogether form any possibility of "anfechtung," from temptation. It is heart in God's Will, which has been obedient unto the point of Godly salvation, and experiences no spiritual birthing pains, or psi ritual phenomena, when we are in the Church, in utero, but fully developed and mature Christians, knowing the heart and mind of the Lord to a finite degree, and transcending ontologically, to meet our creator, at the meta-physical level of reality, of God's reality, and Word. Pure Will as Work IT can only be maintained by Work, everything else will send it into a state of degeneration, potentially infinitely, unless the virtues are strong enough to withhold the temptation at hand. Thus only, work, responsible, is the only action, which may recursively keep the will pure, in of itself. Pure Virtue as Godly Work Without Godly work, it is not possible for the will, to will itself unto "pure virtue," but rather, it must ever deform unto a nothingness, but when the will wills unto action, and action produces knowledge, and knowledge virtue, and the action of virtue produces the knowledge of God, very clearly as isomorphic knowledge, which is most likely the clearest cognitive bit of knowledge, which may clearly allow one to know God, then one may work for Him, by His Spirit and Hand's guidance, and most importantly His Word's. The Work of the Godly It is always done out a heart of hope, faith and love, obedience, responsibility, no ego-centrism, but Spirit of God-centrism, of Christ-centrism, and Jehovah-centrism. It always brings a form of Godly fruit, and existential ministry, with broad, well-defined (if not perfectly defined) metaphysical implication and actualization. Godly Virtue This is virtue which is said to be characteristic of God he Father alone, in which the individual may have the ability to be, as willing oneself on to Godly action, and Godly fruit. TI creates a being of concrete Godly virtue, that one concretely has rendered the virtue of God'S being, and Will, and thus is God's being and Will, as revealed through divine revelation in Jesus Christ the Son. Introduction
I would like to assert two things before I continue with this essay, the first of which is, I am writing this off of a wonderful little blue-tooth keyboard, which works with iPhone 6, and that this will seem totally unfamiliar to those who have never studied either Polanyi, or philosophy in abstracto, and in concreto. It might feel like a mind-re-organization to the finite degree, in which case, that is a sign of responible functioning of the old thinking machine. This essay will topographically cover the topics of a form of epistemology for concrete behavioral expression, and if I can implement the sociological elements, affection as well, in relation with my own personal creation and synthesis, of traditional veins of philosophy from Polanyi, Kant, Carl Jung, Hegel, and Langan, as well as from theologians such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Thomas Aquinas, and Athansius. I used some Saussure and Noam Chomsky, into a concrete and mathematical molde, in my other essay called "Syntax and Bi-Cognimolism." This essay will focus on the bi-cognal epistemology, and the building tenants of behavioral protocols, resulting from an eo ipso, Imago-genic grammatical protocol from birth, unto Godly behavior. of the honest, true,and down-to-earth sicit deus, form of behavior, known in the Christian World, as Kingdom behavior (actual Christian behavior of course, as true concrete individual). Polanyi and The Two Genus' Micheal Polanyi, was a British-Hungarian polymath who knew more about human behavior, than most behaviorists at the time, and more about human nature, than the solipsism, and philosophers who studied such. Of course, this was possible with two very potent elements, namely, a powerful intellect, and faith, which when come together, do not only move mountains, but re-design them, and the entire "Alps of reality," so to speak, which is to say, the entire landscape of God's image, which we live in. The two genus' which are innately and compositely the whole quanta of bi-cognimonalism, allows for really any form of synthetic conglomeration of thought to be possible, and in a sense, do not invalidate any philosophy, or any subset domain of science, phenomenology, and such, as a whole, but rather it attempts to realize, their essences, intrinsically, without really arguing, but accepting, and then working forward, a fortiori, as to not get stuck at one meaningless point, which all points of stagnation, are, for God wants great workers (as Jesus said "truly, unless you do not turn back, and keep working in the Kingdom, then you are unfit for it"), and in regards to our intellects, it means reading without ceasing, but still retaining a form of the same knowledge of what we are reading, with a Christ-additive to it, which makes what one is explosively realistic, by the simple addition of faith and the mind of Christ, apart from the void, and from sin. This form of mind, comprehends, the essence of all thought, as it is, simply because it is a Godly and concrete mind, for it is Jesus Christ, the King of All Things' Mind! Now Polanyi's philosophical generational gift, is very broad, but his best cognitive models, are based off of the Trinity itself, called the "subsidiary focal integration," which integrates the existential, authoritative, and situational natures of respectively, the Christ, God the Father, and the Holy Spirit. These parameters, are comprehensive, and extend unto what knowledge we assert, syntactically from tacit knowledge, at any given time, how we behave, what we behave, what we know, and how we know, and so on. All valid locus' of human nature, can be said to fit snugly at the centerpoint and integration, of the field of these three parameters, and rightly so, as we are made in the Image of God, so why not mathematically reflect His Triune nature at some level as well? This allows us to arbitrarily triangulate all essences. The Behavioral Indexed Remark When one acts out a concrete behavior, they index it. They internalize the organization of the behavior as a comprehensive whole, and it becomes marked with a form of extremely basic a priori system, similar to that of the "phrase marker," described by Noam Chomsky, but instead of ontically marking image of a syntax structure, or string of, it is a concrete and mathematically determinated behavior. Once enough of these, are indexed, there is a form of behavioral grammar, appropriate to ones existential tract, obedience to authority, and unique and constantly updating situation, which may be autonomously organized, so that one can behave autonomously, in a responsible, and highly functional manner as an individual. Basic Autonomous Behavior Most basic autonomous behavior, must be done out of a form of self-sacrifice, or else there is not essentially enough cognitive-cardiac cognitive glue, or nervous system appropriation, unto that which must such a system must be appropriated unto. The nervous system,is designed to change in accordance with ones authority, situation, and general existential tract, infinitely, and organize, and re-organize, at all times, and in all places, to accommodates the highest needs of being Christ-like, and by faith by grace, in Him. This allows for a basic form of autonomy to be present and to form and take place and prevalence over ones individual being, thus creating a form of basic autonomous behavior. The, You Are Me Stage, Behavioral Dependency on Community Most individuals, as being social creatures, us human beings, are at first, behaviorally dependent on community. Us humans, are very good, and taking from external reality, and internalizing it, in order to mimic it, master it, and then re-create such things, in new and unique manners atypically at the meta-level. This need to learn from the community alone, is essential as being a human being, in communio, without which, the whole sub-system of unconscious behavior, would degrade into infinite nothingness, if was not present. Archetypal Form Archetypal form as community and as the "Other," turns into "being-for-others,"very quickly, but alas, differentiating the "I" from the "Other," allowing for any legitimate form of "I-Hood," to be synthetically abstracted. Sentential Logic With community, and the I, and the other, sentential logic serves the individual, and the community, as means to differentiate, abstract the needs of others, the needs of the self apart form others, the style of organization the community partakes in, power structures, and other such things. It is only after such things, is the individual able to behave autonomously as an individual in the community. The, I Am Me Stage, Behavioral Autonomy as True Individual This is the stage, when the individual is truly free from society, from its almost, in utero dependency on others, to be a true individual, inhibiting them from actually becoming a true individual. The bounds of pre-determined social values, are destroyed, and the individual begins to learn other cultures values, and begins to develop a new persona, on their own, based own their own personal likes and dislikes, affections, and mental attributions and such. It is when they become what their epi-genetic limits the biologists, thought the individual was or is constrained to, is crossed, which is why the empiricists, do not like strong or well developed personalities, as it innately invalidates their worldview, and they know it, but resist the truth s Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses! Synthetic Individual When the individual has synthesized their own unique value system, according to say, their existential affect, permutation of situational structures, into generalized mean, or even concrete whole, or relationships with authority, social status, being-as-authority, and such, then a truly and very highly synthetic individual-hood is probablized, and made apparent in nearly any given social context, as responsibly regulated by the individual, towards institution, and towards the Church. Godly Individual The individual whom is Godly, has a unique person-hood, set apart from all the rest, simply because, apart form the synthetic qualities of an individual whom is entering the individual-hood of God, now they have the quality of being-in-Christ, and thus being inside the Godhood, being apparent, and made known. This type of individual will have a highly spiritual self-esteem, much like a young C.S. Lewis, will be bold as a lion, have a unique metaphysical aspect to them, and will be breaking barriers, such as the Social Club rap group, or as Jesus when He was flipping the tables of the Pharisees, wrathful a fortiori. Faith, Obedience, and Responsibility These three qualities, are the qualities of the mark of one whom has put off the old self, even the synthetic one, to put n the new self, described in the Bible. IT is essentially God's Self, being transfigured upon the being, so that the old self, because it has no ability to transcend ipso facto, eo ipso, the New Self, must be put on, or else the individual will be dead for an eternity, in more than one way, which is to say, spiritually and ontologically for their time on earth, but will be in hell for an eternity, a second death. Once the New Self is put on, transcendent capabilities are a norm, and leads to a form of perfect expression, in which i shall describe later. True Individual Expression in God The individual expressing themself in God, is not only expressing the Will of God, but are expressing God Himself. It is expressing God as the Word, God as the Holy Spirit, and God as the Son, Jesus Christ, the historical one. It is not becoming God, but dying, and letting God become you, instead of allowing the ant-Christ, to destroy you and everyone else around you, as is so common in the Western sphere of modal social ontolgies. Perfect Behavioral Indexed Authorship of Synthetic Autonomy The last and finite limit of all human behavior, is not an asymptotic limit, so much as the concrete and finite wall and human limit of behavioral expression, in which if one is mastered over, the are Prophesying, in no vain spirit, or have an apostolic ministry of some shape or form. IT is true sicit deus, in an infinite and transcendent a fortiori, mode of behavior, that no one will be able to ego defense mechanize against, that there is no God, when apprehending such a state. It is becoming a subdue-r of the earth in such a manner as Adam could never have done, and only Christ did always, in re-defining His sphere of sociology, and the shape of all things by doing so. Now, at most, we could only get to this state, twenty percent of the time, as spiritual regressions will come, and plus Western society has denigrated into a pleasure-oriented Machiavellianism, with the spirit of the anti-Christ being distributed finitely and concretely among the population, but for those whom are in Christ, there is no fear, no condemnation. The point is to reach this "perfect behavioral indexed authorship of synthetic autonomy," in Christ, as to counter the godlessness, vile hypocrisy, and death of Western society, because of what the bible describes as the dragon is breathing its fire into all corners of the already half-paganized Western sect of sociality we all share a part in the need to regulate, now, and forever more. |
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |