Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction The limits all physics is constrained to, in all concrete reality, is a cognitive to cosmos asymptotic appropriation, in a 'hopefully' concrete manner, in regards to the cosmos itself, and the description of the cosmos and its subset objects, in the language of math and a grammatically conducive language to the individual whom is physicizing, to explain the implicit math of the thought, into common language . This means that the bounds of the ability of physics to describe anything, is the cosmos itself. This is extremely disappointing, as I would want a math that could describe anything. The wildly accepted thesis of the big bang has become the most widely accepted doctrine in any culture, apart from the trinity in the orthodox culture of Christians. This is an admonished, and unfortunate event, though none apart from the militant intellectuals of the world know why. The idea of the big bang, seems to me, to be a mathematically derived idea, of a self-justifying nominalism that is reminiscent of the behavior of a Godless and self-justifying individual, than it is of good mathematics. The truth is, the idea of the big bang, could easily be refuted with the idea of the big bag, which I will explain below. The Big Bag I think that I could get away with saying, that the mind is much like a big bag. It collects things. Apart from simply collecting things, it breaks things down, and synthesizes them, and puts those things into words. The mind is capable of abstracting anything, and putting those abstractions into a form of syntax, that is, a written language using symbols to express a mutually identifiable cognitive form, abstraction, logic, syntax, or the collection of. It takes actual objects, and phenomena, and recreates it in "archetypal form," that is, a mental picture or pattern of the real object or phenomena (or collection thereof). Then the forms are usually either stored as they are, appreciated, depreciated, loved, hated, or aesthetizied towards the point of idolatry, or even scorned and emptied of any subjective value that an individual may place on such a theoretical object or phenomena. Usually, in the mind of the intellectual, further discourse is needed, and further intellection needs to be taken place, or else they may feel empty or dry, and maybe even guilty, so these forms get shifted over into the other part of the mind,responsible for breaking things down by the laws of either Socratic logic, or mathematical and modal logic, and these forms get organized accordingly. If that wasn't enough, the real creative folk of the realm of the modern intellectuals, seem to also go a step further,and translate these organized states of the cognitive realm, into a form of syntax in poetic manners, resulting in Chesterton esque writers, who can fathom the deepest realms of reality, and with a God-like ease (due to the gift of Prophecy allowing access to the Mind of God), to re-organize these thoughts, forms, logics, in poetic manners, into syntactical structures, with creative and unique grammars, such as the Lewisian prose, or the Tolkienien environment description and character banter in 12th century modes of prose, weaving in and out of meta-thoughts and imagination. Most Prophetic minds, like Bonhoeffer, or Ellen White, and maybe even George MacDonald, are capable of actualizing the entire Imagos, in which the cosmos is the bottom half, and heaven the upper, and the Logos, the true universal syntax, or the Word of God. In reading higher education papers written by Stephen Hawking, his collaborators, and discursively learning about such things over the years, it can be easily concluded that his mind is sterile, and extremely limited in areas of actualization of the Imagos, to the lower half alone, sterilizing his mind from seeing or perceiving the spiritual or heavenly realms, conceding to the fact that his mind is ontologically deficient, however, has extreme sentential logic to syntax capabilities. This allows him to compute what forms he internalizes into extremely abstract and discrete mathematical language, but is limited to the forms of the cosmos, and thus is spiritually blind. Jesus, while having a perfect mind, had a mind to love, and to embody the Will of God, but knew that describing the cosmos, or even the heavens as a comprehensive whole and theory would be useless, without work, and without the Word of God. This is because Jesus could comprehend the whole of reality, and He thus knew laws that Stephen Hawking, in the most intuitively complex reaches of his integration's and imagination, did not know, needed fulfilling and accounting for even though Stephen Hawking was intellectually a priori in regards to such things. Jesus embodied the law of all things, including things mathematical, and laws extended to not merely the cosmos, but to heaven, and took responsibility for all of them. His perfect ontological interlocutor, which helped mediate His mind in relation to reality as a whole, is something, which is imputed to Christians, by faith, and with the work of the Holy Spirit. The Big Bag that is the human mind is capable of internalizing anything, including itself, which makes credence to the fact of faith, that we were in fact made in the image of God, as we reflect the infinitude in which God is, in image form. Image The idea of the image, in the Christian sense, will forever stump physicists with a heavenly stumbling block until the end of time. All cosmos is image, and all heaven is image. We were created in this image, and more specifically, the image of God, was the image of man, before the fall. Man had this fundamental unity with God, as being image sharers, though the fall reduced us to becoming only image bearers, until the Christ came. God, through Christ, allowed us human individuals, a fundamental Imago-genic option, by faith in Jesus, to re-conform to this image, that is God the Father. Humans do the opposite of what God does. Us humans will offer up our own words, which are often barren, formless, and deceitful to the heavens, and almost always in-substantive, while God offers us His Word, in a seemingly (a priori faith,which create spiritual and cosmic blindness often) in-substantive operation, which is made concretely substantive by faith. "The Word became flesh." This means the substantive became human. "The Word was God." This substantive love incarnate, that was also God, that is Jesus Christ, the historical one. The faith roots the heart in this substantive being, whom was Jesus, and thus God's Word is presented for us to internalize by this faith, in that man-God who was Christ. This is the opposite of the human method, as humans will generate grammar relative to this non-God, whom is every man and woman who is not Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the Historical one. Like a computer, which is causated by syntax, into image, this Imagos, was likewise causated. Computers are a primordial sub-microcosm, in a silicone structure. The computers have image, which are called into existence by this syntax, that is computer code. This idea of a pure Imago-genic telic recursion is easy, but self-justification is the devil that will oppose God, and because of this, it becomes a non sequitur in the mind of the self-justifier, that we were not created, even though the creation of the computer is literally a perfect, and teleologically derived form of the human being in silicone form, in its concrete existence in the Imagos. Is it such a stretch of the imagination to imagine such a notion, or such a shrinking of the common ego, to believe in such a thing? A Serious Refutation of the Big Bang Idea All entropy would disagree with the idea of the big bang, but self-justifying and ambiguous logic might confuse the situation. Now it seems like God is simply calling more image from the void, by His Word, than the info-cognitively derived forms of the idea cosmological expansion would like to say. But, because, there is not yet an individual who has internalized the forms of, and transmutated such forms into Socratic or mathematical logic, into a logically conducive syntax which is readily expressed into a higher education culture which could, in a warranted manner, validate the syntax of, it would either be an ad ignoranmium to say that the idea of God calling more form unto creation, or it is an act of comprehending concrete phenomena, which never changes (though our beliefs and forms, and syntax, and logic do) into a culturally conducive language (such as English). The Christian has this upper hand, because they use a direct comprehension to syntax phenomenology to speak and to act, in direct relation to their God, whom is Christ, in which they comprehend His Words and Imagos, and articulate the most necessary syntax as prescribes accordingly to the Truine God's imputationed means of integration (which is perfect) called the subsidiary focal integration, which is a perfect mode of thought, constantly integrating the authoritative, existential, and situational cognition's, with each other, to create the subsidiary focal integration, which allows teleological action to take place, and ontological phenomena to be concretely rendered, by the nature of the Triune integration itself. This, unfortunately, for the scientists, and to the horror of the a priori Christianity scientific community, is in fact a means of perfect thought, in which perfect intelligence is possible, and Plato rolling over in his grave in happiness, towards Jesus, for gifting humanity this perfect means of thought. Conclusion All this said, I would rather trust in the thesis of the faithfully caused mind which is the "big bag," than the thesis of the big bang. For the big bag, which has been re-created by God, in the individual Christians mind, is far more potent, and truth oriented, than any sterile mind could wish to articulate or comprehend, or internalize. That is the result of grace though, and not because of philosophy. Not even this essay can add or subtract value from this big bag, but rather aid in extremely, and almost unjust clarification of such, for the mind that is eternal, and comprehends all as a result of faith by grace, is worthy of only praising the instigator of such a mind, whom is that Triune God. Comments are closed.
|
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |