Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction
It seems to me, that I, have stumbled across the stumbling block of scientists. That is to say, I have mentally rolled in, upon a mental car, which took me to a place of thought, which said "Hey, science is like, almost always infinite self - a priori, why is that?" Then, after a subconscious cognitive leap, unto a spiritually intuitive direction, the Lord revealed to me, it is because they deny His Word. You see, all cosmos is image. Us humans are very good at goofing up, with defining the cosmos using our words, and our math, but very poor at describing things in manners, which give God the Glory and Credit for His Work. Science, is even worse, because it takes one thing, one essence, and seeks to break it down, into cognitive domains, which allow us humans, some means to master such things. Most science, relies on a fool proof means of attaching syntax structure, to innately corrupt sentential logic structure, and then onto either archetypal forms, (the formal of which, must reside, in a purely internal environment of the mind, and a formative setting, being in both domains of external and internal reality, allowing for external and internal object relations, and things to interact responsibly). This essay will dedicate its full attention to the domains of reality, which are left out of the scientific mind and equation. The Word: Why Science Self-Justificatively Denies It One would think, that an individual would have articulated a clear reason as to why science and Christianity have been at ends with one another for hundreds of years. It is because most individuals are lazy and godless, and not responsible and faithful, is the brutally honest answer. Of course, that does not mean that they are not intelligent, it just means that their intellects deny Christ, are irresponsible for Him, and have a form of lazy indifference towards utilizing their mental faculties for spiritual a posteriori operations of cognition, which, if was not the case, we could have a few more C.S. Lewis', with the names of Richard Dawkin's, Stephen Hawking, Michel Foucault, and other such individuals who are or have self-justified against Jesus, in some way, or in many. Science, in of itself, is more or less a sociologically rendered field of thought, which transposes syntax unto concrete form, whether internal or external of the mind. It mainly dabbles in the realms of the cosmos, and only theoretical physics, in terms of strict classical, quid pro quo practicality, investigates post-cosmological phenomena. Thus, science is intrinsically limited and therefore bound, to cosmic form, in itself. Science, usually is basically testing syntax-structure of theories, and banging them against the cosmos, with tests and theorems. This leaves all spiritually possibility, out of the scientific equation, or does it? There have been many instances of the history of science, where their syntax does not quite match up with reality, where the syntax of the Bible does, as has often been the case. Science, I might add, is derived from the infinite self, a priori, human logos, might I add, whereas, the Bible is purely derived, altogether, by authors who were all met a a posteriori, huge life experiences, most likely transcendent selves, which were finite and mathematically crisp, and apart from that, presupposing the Bible is correct, ab initio, taking the hunch into account that those particular individuals had a spiritual influence of the Spirit of God upon their writ, minds, selves, and hands. That seems to have more secular warrant, than science could say, but I know I will be undermined a priori, by such bystanders of false reason of a priori atheists (which is okay, as every single individual human being is an a priori human being at some point, if not at most points in their wondrous life). It is said to be a subset of the Godly Logos, which is to say, His Word, which is not a posteriori, so much as Alpha and Omega, the beginning and end. It ends, and begins, with His Word. Now, His Word does have concrete form, even to some degree, as cosmo-genic form, which is to say, as being a part of the structural whole of the cosmos itself,or at least it helped form it from the void, and called the cosmos and heavens structure unto being. Thus, science leaves out actual form, from direct apprehension, and mental internalization, leaving a form of broken sociological-ontic gestalt-processing to take place. The Christian simply converts external reality, directly into syntax, in a faithful and informal operation, which makes it an almost completely formal means of describing all things in truly true and human terms. The Imago-Genic Limit of Science The imago-genic limit of sciences is reducible to the syntax in which science is able to generate, in its relation with concrete Imago-genic form, that is to say, the form of all that which is in the Imagos, or rather the visio-concrete essence of all that which is. From what we are able to ascertain of science so far, is a broken nominalism, of disputed set rules and principles, poorly defined, and constantly updated, according to cultures socio-scientific general mean of production of scientific knowledge. It is almost a pitiful set of abstract rules, which often send one further apart from concrete reality, when we could simply accept and believe all things of such a reality, and simply convert that into a systematized syntax without self-justifying, but that would be too Godly, and we live and godless age, which is extreme and utter rebellion to the God of the Most High. It creates an abstract set theory, which always commits itself unto a reductio ad absurdum, infinitely, ad infinitum, and creates the form of nominalism, which encourages self-indulges, the flesh, and godlessness. IT is limited in its approach to describing the entirety of the Imagos, in its inability, to integrate to meta-reality mean or norm, which would transductively conduce itself, to an active means of appraising al things, as they are, and converting such concrete and mathematically determinate cognitions, directly into syntax, whether systematized, or simply informally normative, disallowing for the knowledge of truth to be articulate or rendered, without the approval of a strictly rebellious scientific consensus, which is by no means an authority on really much of anything, except a poorly regulated abstract nominalism. Why Science, Kills the Spirit of Knowledge, When Alone Now, because the abstract nominalism, which science conduces itself, to infinite nothingness, or rather a creative nothingness at times, as Bonhoeffer may have called it, it kills the spirit of good, pure, concrete, or otherwise genuine knowledge, simply because it has the ride of being derived eo ipso, from itself, and from the old self, which is infinitely deteriorating anyways, apart from God. This boastfulness is the sort, Jannes and Jambres had the spirit of, when they were opposing Moses. A petulant and embarrassing opposition, which is derived from a hardened heart of pride, without remorse, or genuine self-sacrifice. There is no way, for science in of itself, to concretely render true knowledge, because intrinsically, even in the higher fields of say physics, where there are vast modal operations going on, it is still a form of nominalism, which does not symbolically represent a comprehended reality, but rather set Archimedean pints of reality, and their functions with one another, but not with one another as a whole. Science and Jesus, Are Not Enemies, But Certainly Oppose One Another There is this innate rebellion of scientific method, which is innately anti-God, simply because God is not only a God of knowledge, but a God of concrete reality and the eo ipso concrete comprehensions and descriptions, thereof. Jesus, is not a huge fan of science, simply because of its ever apostacying stance towards legitimate truth, or syntax structure which accurately describes, a substantive formal, or formative reality (or the integration therein, say of action of a substantive person, in a well behaved or responsible manner, trying to articulate a formal reality, into their community, for the sake of sharing a particular, concrete, abstract, spiritual, ontological, or comprehensive truth). This inability of science to mete out truth, except in an extremely poorly regulated, and nominalistic style, puts it before Christ, as enemy of sorts, a prior Christ, and a priori, much of anything, This sort of extreme skepticism, is almost blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, in of itself, and condemned on the spot, simply because it will never be able to reach the Lamb, eo ipso, or the truth therein, and thus will always be a form of a priori, and even synthetic delusion, which denies God, when one may have repressed and innate knowledge of Him, as our minds internalize external reality as a whole, and thus has natural knowledge of God, validating Paul’s assertions of such, because, the mind is more of a mirror, or a camcorder, which may actively re-construct reality, not simply in its image form, but in its concrete form. This is why dreams feel so real, it is because of the minds ability to re-create reality, not only in visio-concrete form, but also, how such aviso-concrete essence, I like to call the Imagos, is able to appeal to the senses, in concrete mathematical manners, of sense comprehension. I read to much Hegel, and Descartes to not pull that phrase out, I am sorry! How Science Could Rest in the Lamb It would need to disband much of its skepticism, accept the lamb, either from a synthetic a posertiori concrete realization of divine revelation outwards, into a stronger means of scientific method, capable of testing the Imagos, and then converting the whole of the Imagos, into a form of systematized syntax, which we can manipulate to “subdue the earth,” and help organize society for the purpose of building the Kingdom, and furthermore, concretize the whole of science into a field of though, which more so realistic, and not a priori, scientifically synthetic outward, by the means of scientific method esque mode of thought and testing, but rather, find a concrete means of relating to reality, in of itself, using a strong, non-dualistic Aristotelian means of thought, or the ratiocinator system (which may intrinsically define, thought, matter, an syntax, and the concrete, abstract, and even to some degree, spirituals relations therein, in a simple and arbitrarily progressing manner) I am working on, or find other means of concretely describing concrete reality in a manner which allows for sociological progression and practical use of physical resources, in mathematical and simple, manners to help get ones needs met, and innovate with new technologies, and such. Comments are closed.
|
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |