Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction
As adheres to my other posts on bi-cognominalism, this one shall offer the kinetic outwardness of the essence of such, because it is so concrete, and stable a form of phenomenology, and provokes one unto the Will of Jehovah, instead of arbitrariness and false individuality. I shall dialectically enumerate on the two divisive domains of fiction and non-fiction reading in its relation with bi-cognominalism. Since, those two genus' of books are absolutely different in their substance, I feel there is a rudimentary a priori and a posteriori synthetic relationship between the two, which may need elaboration as well, because fictions borrows 80 percent of its structure from concrete reality, and non-fiction, ab initio. The Foundation of all Reading: Syntax and Image All syntax is image, but not all image is syntax. Syntax is the articulated form of image. Our minds, are made more so in the image of God, and thus we reflect His properties, wayyyyyy more than the other animals on this planet do. All reading is an act of actively transmuting this "syntactical image," into the other cognitive domains responsible, for say, imagination, consciousness, knowledge, learning, behavior, to the point where most intuitively have already comprehend these statements, but do not have the ability to clearly articulate such realities, in clear normative prose, or have not yet learned to become responsible, as a lifestyle, or are not yet inside the Will of God. The Reality of Syntax and Image All reality is image, but not all image is reality. I know this gets confusing, but it adheres to the order of everything, as made clear in Aristotle's genus-species logic (but what about modal logic, says all the philosophy majors, or Turing modalities, the math majors), even though Aristotle's genus-species logic is more archaic than most fossils which we dig up, in out modern times are. This "reality," is a bit more than simple image, even if the cosmos and heavens, without being reduced into a reductio ad absurdum of an argument, could be said to be a form of holographic trans-dimensional image, with a visio-concrete essence, which absolutely exists outside of the mind. Of course, holographic in the sense, in which it has Minkowski-dimensionality, and Lorentzian annulments. However, these mathematical inferences are less adequate than trying to spell out a form of language which has never been heard of in a certain part of the world before, and then belligerently trying to get ones needs met in such a language. At the individual level, our minds, as being made in the image of God, interact with the cosmos and heavens, in a bit more direct, personal, infinitely a fortiori and transcendent manner, compared to, say, animals, disagreeing with Alasdair MacIntyre's thesis on humans even truly being, in realistic rationality, "animals," but have a more sui generis genus as a species, even though most moderns, and I sometimes, behave like pleasure oriented animals, or beasts (as in thirios, from Revelations - more on this later in my blog) A Priori Internalization of Syntax Coming out of the womb, humans have an epigenetically rendered ability to read, and thus anything they read, until their knowledge, in which the basic forms are image, syntax, and the relation therein, considered logic, vehemently, by most metaphysicians and servants of the domain of math, and thus, one is able to internalize syntax, before coming to a finite knowledge of what the syntax structure, represents internally, externally, or in the place in between, the formative domain, where forms exist from within and from without. This is an important stage, to internalize as many syntax structures as one can, even if one cannot finitely come to the knowledge of the truth yet. This stage usually takes place in toddlers, and ends at the age of 5, however, in modernity, there are those who have regressed into the void, wiping out all knowledge of the truth, which is just syntax, finitely integrated with external or internal forms, which such a syntax represents, and thus, adults are perpetually sucked into this state, if stuck in the pleasure - oriented Machiavellian state of godlessness, in which so syntactical recursion can take place on their abstracted or internalized forms. Syntax and Posteriori Grammatical Inference and Temporal Organization Those whom work their way out of the void (which can take years of extremely confusing and delicate psychic process re-mapping, and Christ-sourced spiritual strengthening) usually come to the ability to develop the ability to become syntax affluent to the manner in which they grammatically inference at the substance of the syntactical image in which they are appraising, internalizing, comprehending, or apprehending, in which they inference the grammatical rules, and networks thereof in which they have learned, and quickly, using their noetic faculties, assertively judge which ones are most responsible and appropriate for the syntax image or images at hand, in order to temporally organize them, to create their (hopefully) overall proper meaning, in clear contextual form, conducing either the most important information for the individual reading at hand, or trying to empathize with the authors genuine thoughts, forms, and processes, and accurately constructing a form of reader-to-author empathy, getting the most substance out of that which is being read. This is being temporally (in the sterile mind) organized in the peripheral cognitions and faculties such as imagination, allowing the benefit of mentally constructing what is being syntactically articulated, in the internal world and mind, in its full mathematical parameters, of course, that is to say, only if the mind is trained, responsible, and well-developed. Archetypal Form This is absolutely an essential topic for reading, as archetypal forms play the largest role in reading, apart from the syntax itself, whereas sentential logic, merely points the syntax, with its respective and accurate "archetypal form." External reality, may be interpreted through the crux of a form, or the form may exist purely from within, as a classical archetypal form. These may be broken down, and certain domains of these forms may be related with each other, by sentential logic to create complex object relations, and abstract syntax and prose. Sentential Logic Sentential logic, merely allows for external and internal domains to be concretely rendered as finite things, and higher processes and more well developed sentential logic processes, differentiate, create heavy abstract object relations, and perform many tasks related with syntax and imagery, and the organization therein. That being said, us humans can master such a faculty, and not become autonomous and mindless sentential logicians, but may readily and consciously re-adapt such configurations, to say, create mental boundaries against weird thoughts, or pre-engineer tacitly a tangentially specific existential tract (this is usually a sterile and dangerous activity, as when its programed, usually one forgets to include, the ability to concretely render ones situation with each passing moment, or responsible obedience to all forms of authority, whether simple, normal, complex, or divine. Non-Fiction and Knowledge Ontico-Ontic Re-Creation of Real and Living Substance Non-fiction is far more easy to read, for the mind, which has not experienced too much of external reality and become a posteriori reality, and thus is more practical for the inexperienced or the sheltered. The ability to ontico-ontically re-create external reality and visio-concrete substance, as a finite internal construct, is a necessary human activity, without which, organizing objects to create complex technology, would be absolutely preposterous. The knowledge therein is absolutely essential, and without which, life will be a frustrating series of events, leaving you feeling powerless, and infinitely regressing into a godless, hypocritical, and ever degrading into godless state, and void. God wants us to learn about everything, for God is a God of knowledge. 1 Samuel 2:3, and one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is knowledge. That's in Ephesians. The syntax of non-fiction, usually is a lot more referential to things in which one has already experienced, and thus the reading of non-fiction is a lot easier on the mind and the psyche. Such a process is called "imagination," and in this case spurred by human experience and reading non-fiction books. Imagination and Active Reading Imagination, is essentially, the ontico-onto re-construction of some formative, formal, or substantive reality, whether external or internal of the individual, so that one has this realistic formative or internal projection of the real forms, abstracted, and put on such an almost cognitive holographic screen (if the formative means of imagination). Imagination, used in formal settings, is usually sub-conscious, and very abstract, to accommodate a goal, or enriching the present sociology with righteous, good, and bold sociological substance or fruit. The art of reading fruitfully is completely dependent on ones ability to actively imagine, while reading very actively, and very a posteriori-ly, aggressively, and at times hostile, and assertively at other times, as to get mental needs met, and very much aggressively moving forward mentally, a fortiori. A Priori Language of Fiction, as an A Priori Individual This is an impossible task, and if tried, will wear the brain down into a flagellum, or cognitive mess, at the least! However, one may a priori, without knowledge gained through experience, a priori, learn the syntax of reading, fiction, and then later attach such internalized syntax to their true counterparts, later on, to create a real a posterior integration into true knowledge, from an almost faithful, a priori, reading, into faithfully waiting for an experience where one can integrate such fruitfully, can crop up. Fiction and Posterior Knowledge of Ontico-Ontic Knowledge If the fiction in question contains narratives, and patterns, objects, personas, and divine phenomena, one has experienced, it is a lot easier to integrate such posteriori knowledge, in which the syntax and forms come pre-integrated while reading, so that one may read the fiction and accurately and acutely render the ontico-ontic knowledge on the spot, and actually enjoy the form of the fiction at hand. Meta-Appraisal and Meta-Contextualization This is where anthologies are rendered on the spot, as with ones entire tacit knowledge base, in which all external syntactical domains are appraised, as well as all internal, formal, and formative domains, as a formal sifting operation, in which the spiritual man is always doing 1 Corinthians 2:16, in which all patterns are meta-contextualized into meta-knowledge, allowing for a form of lifestyle in which knowledge is actualized at the meta-level as a meta-modern is absolutely possible. Comments are closed.
|
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |