Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction
I'd like to start off this essay, by saying, that this essay, nor any of the others, are personal vindictive remarks towards objectivists whom have hurt me personally (and many have, as we will discuss the phenomenology of how this is possible later in this essay), but rather, my personal and naive attempts at a mildly serious refutation of the things in which I seek to slice apart with the spiritually imputed sword of truth. Now this essay will contain many remarks of the deception of objectivism, in its relation with actual truth and reality (first pillar of objectivism destroyed first, and the rest, I shall destroy as well) and why it can be extremely damaging to society, Christians, and everyone who gets caught up in a relationship where they have now become an "object." May the weightiest object win, and may the truth be distilled in these words in which I humbly and self-sacrificially, through much pain of the Spirit, speak. The Worst Object of All: Objectivism One might think from the outcries of women, and from the now observable slow disintegration of Western society, into a Godless void, that there might be some faint idea, of why objectifying everything, including humans, God, women, men, and money, might seem a bit sacrilegious to the goal of creating a better world, but, as goes with the Christian doctrine of total depravity, if not validating it wholly, humans just do not got a clue, and keep spiraling down the void of self-love and self-interest, and trying to seek restless Machiavellian gain, where one should be living peacefully in harmony and community with one another, out of the value of "love for another," or from the spoken command of God, to "love thy neighbor." The First Pillar, The False Self Assertion into Godhood The absolutist axioms which Ayn Rand presented, were derived from the human logos, but falsely proclaimed to be the Godly Logos, and thus provided this extremely deceptive beginning to a new philosophy, which claimed Godhood over all, for mere men, and falsely justified self-interest, at the expense of faith, culture, self-sacrifice, and actual truth. As bold and intellectually innovative as these claims were, it seems that they lack any further justification, at merely risking the isolation of the individual from community, at the false providence which Ayn Rand has bestowed and callously inserted her philosophy upon mankinde as a whole. While I greatly admire Ayn Rand's clarity of articulation, and her beauty of heart, innate truth-value assertion, and such, it very much seems as if her philosophy, as a whole, insidiously omits the foundation of all actual truth, whom is Jesus Christ. Now the mathematical revolution of philosophy greatly influenced her thought, and system, and provided her with a cohesive philosophy, which at its core, in terms of logic 'alone,' is intrinsically valid, in some areas, giving it the ability to give it some reduced, and yet somewhat sterile, ontological force. However, her inability to provide a valid syntax epistemology and meta-physic alone could invalidate her philosophy as a whole, as being even 'relatively' close to a form of "absolute truth," and thus has committed itself unto a meta-physical fallacy (and technically ad ignorantium, by not further investigating the axioms absolutism, in the presence of clear truth) by denying any true form of spirituality and genuine metaphysical ontological-transcendent mechanism, birthed by faith in Jesus alone. The result is, a form of mathematical deception, which allows one to mathematize the Imagos, and its structure and creatures of very docile orientation and loving predispositions, into little objects, which are merely disposable at the gratifying whim of the "objectivists." The Phenomenology of the Destructive Aspects of Objectivism When an objectivist comes along in ones existential meanderings of the Imagos, it is too often, that one becomes a victim. The phenomenology is clearly articulable, and I shall attempt to deliver it here. The objectivist, sees other human beings as objects, that is to say, a form of mathematical concept to be used arbitrarily for the ends of the objectivist, for the value of self-interest, and self-aggrandizement. This denies the individuals right to "I-hood," or even being a creature of God, and denies its right to live as a creature of God, in the Imagos. This is an ultimate form of trespass against another individual, and leads to frustration, if the object does not "perform its function," as being a disposable means to the objectivists ends. When these frustrations build up, and the objectivist comes across a strong personality, with strong value-oriented boundaries, and an aristocratic predisposition, the objectivists becomes a relentless, power hungry, Machiavellianist. The feelings of frustration and powerlessness can compound and turn the individual into a psychopath or "malignant narcissist," (to be used in the philosophical sense), which traits of are: a psychological need for power, ego-syntonic aggression (aggression that feels natural), joyful cruelty, the dehumanization of otherwise normal creatures, undermining with out knowledge, or a priori, and other such wicked and detestable phenomena. These individuals idealize destructive aspects of their ego, and wish to take over the world, and partake in paranoid negative projections, and are considered by Eric Fromm, a prominent social psychologist, to be "symbolically representative of the quintessence of evil." Generally, objectivists, are weak personalities, with a strong selfish ambition, and are mostly white middle class males, with a general callous unconcern for the well being of others. This is damaging. When one gets caught up in a relationship with this type of individual, their life is usually destroyed systematically. I have been victimized by many of these individuals in the modern Protestant Church, and many of them exhibited a readiness to kill, which one would expect out of a serial killer (which malignant narcissism is usually the psychological modus operandi of the serial killer, and crime syndicate leaders). At a sociological scale, this creates a community of destructive capabilities, seeing themself as doing good, loyal towards one another, and yet, and yet fundamentally spreading wickedness and deceit upon all whom come across. It can become extremely destructive to society, if unregulated, and may very well cause the death of the Church, in the modern Protestant culture, if not immediately cast out like the demon ideology it is. Objectivism, and Truth: Opposites or Unequivocally Equivocal as Truth Truth, it seems, is more or less, syntax structures, which accurately represent external reality, or aspects of the Imagos (the fundamental image of that which is, both the visio-concrete essence of the cosmos and heavens), while going through the process of the individuals mind, of internalizing external realities, into image form, and the grammar-logic-language process, of being morphologically transmutated into warranted syntactical form, or "proper syntax," as I like to assert the "proper name" of. Objectivism, hails the formation of these grammars, as conforming to the grammar of objectivist, and thus the cognitive-syntactical structures are brunted into becoming concrete mathematical idealizations, in which one has a form of concrete identification of, before they can ever be apprehended in their internal form, as they are. This causes innate deception, and a complete lack of the ability to realize internal or external reality as it is, thus causing one to form perceptions which are very one-dimensional, mathematically retarded, emotionally detached, and by all means, inhuman. Christ would be screaming at the Churches which embody this philosophy, as it destroys any existentialism, which is potentiated and regulated by faith in Jesus Christ. It thus, is apparent, that one may not even "enter the Kingdom," as result, and one, if an objectivist, can only be a Pharisee, if not a malignant Pharisee, while adhering to the actual philosophical precepts of objectivism. Thus, one could say, that objectivism, is neither truly untruth, nor truth, in itself as a whole, though many logic's would deny its partisanship into truth-hood, because it commits the fallacies as a whole, of being meta-physically and ontologically deficient (and transcendentally dead) in its ability to interlocute spiritual phenomena, and the ad ignorantium, which presumes the axioms are truth, without any further investigation, a priori, and it is thus a form of selfish selective truth (in very discrete areas), but because of its focus on barren abstractions alone, renders it a reductio ad absurdum, committing itself unto infinite self-aggrandizement, and the likely implicit destruction of the self and the community. It is by all means a condemned philosophy, set for destruction by the Will and Hand of Jesus, and His Spirit. Comments are closed.
|
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |