Faith, reason, madness. what is what?
Introduction
It seems all too well, that it may be more simple than we have expected, that is, the explanation of dreams. As a Christian oneirology (the study of dreams), this phenomenology must take the claims of science, against the claims of Christianity, and thus assert itself, to make out the science to be a reduction, and explain why science can read such phenomena, in a reductionistic language, and also how to interpret the dreams. This blog post, to keep a steady distance away from occult phenomena, or non-Christian spiritual tainting, must thus conform itself, to the infinitude of the imago of Christ, out of a genuine heart of faith, or it will thus fail in its mission to deliver such a phenomena. This is What Dreams Are Made Of, Literally As conforming of the rules of the knowledge theory, in which I have theologically curated from scratch, and philosophically delineated the boundaries of in "The Hairston Knowledge Theory," I asserted that three main faculties create the mind from the "ground up," namely, syntax, forms, and logic. The three interact with each others, teleologically conducive to the being in question, more or less, based on their epistemic foundation, which, if Christian by faith, is Christ Himself, allowing the language of that being to be God's language, and the resulting processes and teleological developments, to take place from the ground up, in His form of Holiness. Thus, dreams, could be said, to be the hyper-integration of these logic and forms, based on the Godly Logos, allowing for the sentential logic, and archetypal forms to integrate in a fashion, technically in a manner, which is conforming to the image of Christ, but also precluding the actualization, and carrying out of God's Will. Thus, the individual who dreams a dream, in the light of Christ, will have "Christian dreams,"which may be consciously described by a Christian interpreter, who knows how to decode the explicit dream structure, in a language which is culturally conducive, to the individuals whom are listening to that individual. The descriptor in question, must have the Logos internalized, and know how to read it in the mind of others, and articulate the resulting forms and logic's, or the bonded results (normative mental noumena, as opposed to self-justifying and borderline Kantian occult phenomena), in a manner, which is linguistically capable of comprehension by those whom are listening to the individual interpret or describe such dreams. Now the non-theological, is dangerous, in that, the human logos is often deceptive, and creates disorganization and disunion very quickly, and is highly susceptible to demons altering such things arbitrarily, to create disunion in alignment with Satan's will, opposing Jehovah's. Thus, an individual, if interpreting dreams of others, whose minds are not epistemically rooted in Christ, must take extreme caution that they themselves are rooted in Christ by faith, and in the Godly Logos, lest they fall to misinterpretation, and run the risk of internalizing the subtle prose of satan and demons, which often affects the human logos. However, the individual, whom is firmly rooted in Christ, and interprets another individuals dreams, whom epistemic foundation is not the Godly Logos, but the sheepish and apostate human alternative (the often extremely prideful, human logos), will be able to interpret the dreams with pure accuracy. Dreams are capable of predicting the future, in normative mental noumenonic manners, or they can integrate aspects of the personality, and really can be a comprehensive formula, for integrating ones life (milk aids in good dreaming, and good dreaming, leads to an integrated, and well organized life). The Seeds Pre-Figure the Tree The epistemic foundation, or what the being in questions mind is rooted upon, will not only determine their entire life structure, and the structures of other individuals life, as goes along with being "social creatures," it also determines the general pattern or structure of the dreams, or the literal noumenonic language. If the being identifies itself, with something, most concurrently, then one may be able to say, that that is most likely its epistemological foundation, namely its identity (whether true or false is irrelevant here). Thus it could be said that the seeds which are the epistemic foundation, prefigures the trees, or, more or less, the entire structure of the mind and the concurrent general patterns and structures of the dreams. I, as being a self-righteous gentile predicates, assert that one must always be rooted in Christ. Thus, the wondrous and glory-ridden seed that is Christ, if the seed of the mind, may become a tree of the like in which few pagans of the Greek poet times of Homer, would absolutely fail to conceive of. They simply do not have the language of the Word. Science's Petty View of Dreams Science, in a nutshell, offers us a view of dreams, that is filtered through a social consensus, after it has undergone various and ambiguous scientific method processes, and came out with a possibly invalid result, on which everyone may agree or disagree upon. It is a blind mans chess game. There are many theories of dreams, one of which, the great psychological skeptic, Sigmund Freud asserted, "the sexual aspect of the being, is God," while basing his dream psychology on such, left barren the mind, devoid of anything good, but what is left, is the fable of Sigmund Freud, and not a very Holy one at that! The current consensus of cognitive psychology, would state, that it is mere integration (while denying any meta-physical constraints, which is creating a multi-fallacious argument, reductio ad absurdum, ad ignorantium, metaphysical fallacies, etc) of information of the mind,processing short-term memory data, into functional long-term memory, and furthermore, into instinctual behavioral schematics, which can be accessed at any time, and acted upon. I, personally, being meta-theologically and meta-philosophically a posteriori, would challenge this assertion, to be roughly 5 percent of the entirety of the function of dreams, as often than nought, science forgets about the Imagos, or even the cosmos, and reduces itself to a sheepish and unstable abstract nominalism, which is then only validated by "peers." That is unwise, in the eyes of a philosopher, and creates many pockets of ambiguity, and places where there is no truth, but a skeptical and vague possibility of it. The theological manner of tackling this issue, is far easier, as spiritual men comprehend phenomena as a whole, and convert their comprehension, directly into warranted syntax, which they may articulate or write down in little mole skin journals. The Joy of Good Science Often, while deriding science, one forgets, to give science its due credit. While I admit that science is paranoid field of thought, and creates cognitive deterioration in infinite regression, as well as disorganization at all levels of being, if idolized, it does however, have the ability to mete out nominal truth. This is not truth as a whole, but rather, as nominalism goes, one abstract archemedian point of truth. It is taking a circle, full of mysterious and wondrous colors, but only looking at the points in which one self-righteously and self-justifyingly would like to pen out for themselves, and denying the rest of the circle. All nominalism, is extremely selfish, and opposed to God in every way, and always will lead to self-aggrandizement. However, as social creatures, there is a consensus to uphold, to help warrant and validate such things. So, these archemedian points, must go through the rigorous social process of becoming warranted, in which many individuals, agree that these archemedian points, are being described correctly, as what they are, in the mode of thought, social process, and speech of science. The result, thereof, is in fact, nominal truth (hopefully, if science was being responsible, which it often is not). When translated into oneirology, this allows for a form of interpretation of dreams, in a strict adherence to this nominalised language of science, and in the intrinsic bounds of such, is able to describe certain concrete functions, but as I said earlier, only roughly 5%. That is how science is able to create redutionistic language of interpreting dreams, though would deny the Godly Logos, rendering it extremely susceptible to a form of intellectual nothingness, rising in the form of existential nihilism. This is a similar social process (it started with Nietzsche at the human level, but the dragon, or being of the heavily satanic sort with theological a posterior knowledge) which has created the modern void. That infinite nihilism, which self-aggrandizes, and sucks all God out of any possible scientific equation. Dreaming The Dream of Reading the Dream Earlier I gave a brief description of what needs to be present philosophically and theologically to interpret dreams truthfully (the Godly Logos must be internalized, and one must be able to read the minds of others, or hear a description of another individuals dreams - both are possible, though one requires a deep spiritual empathy, and the other a loving and listening ear), but this is a simple task for the follower of Christ, and thus I will leave it up to them to take responsibility for such, and to learn how to let the Godly Logos and the Spirit internalize the logos of others, in a manner which allows them to comprehend the dreams of others, and articulate the structures back to them and their comprehensive meaning, in a language conducive to the surrounding individuals whom are listening to the interpretation. Comments are closed.
|
AuthorAmerican autodidact. Multiple Languages. Meta-Philosophy. One faith, in one Christ. Trying to embody the Will of God in valley of shadow and death, amongst demons, and amongst dragons. Archives
May 2023
Categories |